Literature DB >> 9559607

Effect of advance directives on the management of elderly critically ill patients.

M D Goodman1, M Tarnoff, G J Slotman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of advance directives on the management of elderly, critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Teaching hospital medical/surgical, noncardiac intensive care unit (ICU). PATIENTS: The medical records of 401 patients, > or =65 yrs of age, admitted to the ICU between 1992 and 1995 were reviewed.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Advance directive statements included refusal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), nutrition, intravenous medications, antibiotics, mechanical ventilation, and blood products. Nineteen (5%) patients had advance directives (study group). These patients were compared with 28 case-matched (age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and diagnosis) critically ill patients without advance directives (control group). We compared the following data: cost per day; number of surgical procedures; number of radiographic studies; number of central venous and pulmonary artery catheter insertions; number of complete blood counts, electrolytes, and cultures sent for laboratory testing; number of days in the ICU/hospital; and mortality rates. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test for independent means and the chi-square equation. For all observed parameters, quantitative and dichotomous differences between study and control groups were not statistically significant. Two patients received CPR, despite advance directive statements refusing this treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Few critically ill seniors have advance directives. As assessed by objectively documented information, the level of care delivered to elderly ICU patients is not affected by the presence or absence of advance directive statements. Medical personnel need to be aware of whether or not patients have advance directive statements, as unauthorized CPR was administered to 11% of the patients who died with advance directives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9559607     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199804000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  17 in total

1.  Too soon to give up: re-examining the value of advance directives.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Michael J Green
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Documentation of advance care planning for community-dwelling elders.

Authors:  Victoria Y Yung; Anne M Walling; Lillian Min; Neil S Wenger; David A Ganz
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Pragmatic methods to avoid intensive care unit admission when it does not align with patient and family goals.

Authors:  Nita Khandelwal; Ann C Long; Robert Y Lee; Cara L McDermott; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 30.700

4.  Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.

Authors:  Maria J Silveira; Scott Y H Kim; Kenneth M Langa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Advance directives in an oncologic intensive care unit: a contemporary analysis of their frequency, type, and impact.

Authors:  Neil A Halpern; Stephen M Pastores; Joanne F Chou; Sanjay Chawla; Howard T Thaler
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Use of aggressive medical treatments near the end of life: differences between patients with and without dementia.

Authors:  Samuel S Richardson; Greer Sullivan; Ariel Hill; Wei Yu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  End-of-life decisions in intensive care medicine-shared decision-making and intensive care unit length of stay.

Authors:  Jan A Graw; Claudia D Spies; Felix Kork; Klaus-D Wernecke; Jan-Peter Braun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Substitute decision making in medicine: comparative analysis of the ethico-legal discourse in England and Germany.

Authors:  Ralf J Jox; Sabine Michalowski; Jorn Lorenz; Jan Schildmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-11-07

9.  Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Mark Siegler; Anna Abalos; Rachael M Moloney; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The ETHICA study (part I): elderly's thoughts about intensive care unit admission for life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  F Philippart; A Vesin; C Bruel; A Kpodji; B Durand-Gasselin; P Garçon; M Levy-Soussan; J L Jagot; N Calvo-Verjat; J F Timsit; B Misset; M Garrouste-Orgeas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.