BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients frequently lack decision-making ability, yet little is known about physicians' approaches to surrogate decision making. OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional written survey. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for adult inpatients in one academic and two community hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Key features of physicians' most recent surrogate decision-making experience, including the nature of the decision, the physician's reaction, physician-surrogate communication and physician-surrogate agreement about the best course of action. RESULTS: Nearly three fourths of physicians (73%, n = 206) had made a major decision with a surrogate during the past month. Although nearly all patients (90%) had a surrogate, physicians reported trouble contacting the surrogate in 21% of cases. Conflict was rare (5%), and a majority of physicians agreed with surrogates about the medical facts (77%), prognosis (72%) and best course of action (65%). After adjustment for patient, physician and decision characteristics, agreement about the best course of action was more common among surrogates for older patients [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.17 for each decade; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.31], ICU patients (PR = 1.40; CI 1.14-1.51) and patients who had previously discussed their wishes (PR = 1.60; CI 1.30-1.76), and less common when surrogates were difficult to contact (PR = 0.59; CI 0.29-0.92) or when the physician self-identified as Asian (PR = 0.60; CI 0.30-0.94). CONCLUSION: Surrogate decision making is common among hospitalized adults. Physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients frequently lack decision-making ability, yet little is known about physicians' approaches to surrogate decision making. OBJECTIVE: To describe physicians' experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional written survey. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for adult inpatients in one academic and two community hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Key features of physicians' most recent surrogate decision-making experience, including the nature of the decision, the physician's reaction, physician-surrogate communication and physician-surrogate agreement about the best course of action. RESULTS: Nearly three fourths of physicians (73%, n = 206) had made a major decision with a surrogate during the past month. Although nearly all patients (90%) had a surrogate, physicians reported trouble contacting the surrogate in 21% of cases. Conflict was rare (5%), and a majority of physicians agreed with surrogates about the medical facts (77%), prognosis (72%) and best course of action (65%). After adjustment for patient, physician and decision characteristics, agreement about the best course of action was more common among surrogates for older patients [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.17 for each decade; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.31], ICU patients (PR = 1.40; CI 1.14-1.51) and patients who had previously discussed their wishes (PR = 1.60; CI 1.30-1.76), and less common when surrogates were difficult to contact (PR = 0.59; CI 0.29-0.92) or when the physician self-identified as Asian (PR = 0.60; CI 0.30-0.94). CONCLUSION: Surrogate decision making is common among hospitalized adults. Physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated.
Authors: K E Covinsky; J D Fuller; K Yaffe; C B Johnston; M B Hamel; J Lynn; J M Teno; R S Phillips Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: P H Ditto; J H Danks; W D Smucker; J Bookwala; K M Coppola; R Dresser; A Fagerlin; R M Gready; R M Houts; L K Lockhart; S Zyzanski Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2001-02-12
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Sandra Petronio; Christianna Purnell; Siu Hui; Christopher M Callahan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Kianna Montz; Siu L Hui; James E Slaven; Christopher M Callahan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Lucia D Wocial; James E Slaven; Kianna Montz; Patrick O Monahan; Susan E Hickman; Christopher M Callahan; Paul R Helft; Greg A Sachs; Lev Inger; Emily S Burke; Alexia M Torke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Sandra Petronio; Christianna E Purnell; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Christopher M Callahan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 5.562