OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether acute care patients with dementia are more or less likely to receive each of five aggressive medical services near the end of life, compared with patients without dementia. DATA SOURCES: Two years of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare utilization data for all 169,036 VA users nationwide age 67 and older who died between October 1, 1999 and September 30, 2001. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of acute care stays discharged in the final 30 days of life. The main outcome measure was the patient's likelihood of receiving each of five aggressive services (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ventilator, cardiac catheterization, pulmonary artery monitor, and dialysis), controlling for demographic and clinical factors in probit regressions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There were 122,740 acute-stay discharges during the final 30 days of life, representing 94,100 unique patients (31,654 with dementia). In probit models comparing acute care patients with and without dementia, patients with dementia were 7.5 percentage points less likely to be admitted to the ICU (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 6.9-8.1; percent of stays with ICU admission=36.8 percent), 5.4 percentage points less likely to be placed on a ventilator (95 percent CI, 5.0-5.9; percent of stays with ventilator use=17.1 percent), 0.7 percentage points less likely to receive cardiac catheterization (95 percent CI, 0.6-0.8; percent of stays with cardiac catheterization=2.7 percent), 1.4 percentage points less likely to receive pulmonary artery monitoring (95 percent CI, 1.2-1.5; percent of stays with pulmonary artery monitoring=2.6 percent), and 0.6 percentage points less likely to receive dialysis (95 percent CI, 0.4-0.8; percent of stays with dialysis=4.6 percent). CONCLUSIONS: During the final 30 days of life, acute care patients with dementia are treated substantially less aggressively than patients without dementia. Further research is warranted to determine the causes and appropriateness of these patterns of care.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether acute care patients with dementia are more or less likely to receive each of five aggressive medical services near the end of life, compared with patients without dementia. DATA SOURCES: Two years of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare utilization data for all 169,036 VA users nationwide age 67 and older who died between October 1, 1999 and September 30, 2001. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of acute care stays discharged in the final 30 days of life. The main outcome measure was the patient's likelihood of receiving each of five aggressive services (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ventilator, cardiac catheterization, pulmonary artery monitor, and dialysis), controlling for demographic and clinical factors in probit regressions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There were 122,740 acute-stay discharges during the final 30 days of life, representing 94,100 unique patients (31,654 with dementia). In probit models comparing acute care patients with and without dementia, patients with dementia were 7.5 percentage points less likely to be admitted to the ICU (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 6.9-8.1; percent of stays with ICU admission=36.8 percent), 5.4 percentage points less likely to be placed on a ventilator (95 percent CI, 5.0-5.9; percent of stays with ventilator use=17.1 percent), 0.7 percentage points less likely to receive cardiac catheterization (95 percent CI, 0.6-0.8; percent of stays with cardiac catheterization=2.7 percent), 1.4 percentage points less likely to receive pulmonary artery monitoring (95 percent CI, 1.2-1.5; percent of stays with pulmonary artery monitoring=2.6 percent), and 0.6 percentage points less likely to receive dialysis (95 percent CI, 0.4-0.8; percent of stays with dialysis=4.6 percent). CONCLUSIONS: During the final 30 days of life, acute care patients with dementia are treated substantially less aggressively than patients without dementia. Further research is warranted to determine the causes and appropriateness of these patterns of care.
Authors: Lisa R Shugarman; Diane E Campbell; Chloe E Bird; Jon Gabel; Thomas A Louis; Joanne Lynn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ellen B Clarke; J Randall Curtis; John M Luce; Mitchell Levy; Marion Danis; Judith Nelson; Mildred Z Solomon Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tara Lagu; Marya D Zilberberg; Jennifer Tjia; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Mihaela Stefan; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Pedro Gozalo; Joan M Teno; Susan L Mitchell; Jon Skinner; Julie Bynum; Denise Tyler; Vincent Mor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heather Ma; Rachel E Kiekhofer; Sarah M Hooper; Sarah Dulaney; Katherine L Possin; Winston Chiong Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Xhyljeta Luta; Maud Maessen; Matthias Egger; Andreas E Stuck; David Goodman; Kerri M Clough-Gorr Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 3.612