Literature DB >> 1988727

The no-scalpel vasectomy.

S Q Li1, M Goldstein, J Zhu, D Huber.   

Abstract

A refined method of delivering the vas deferens for vasectomy has been developed and used in China since 1974. This method eliminates the scalpel, results in fewer hematomas and infections, and leaves a smaller wound than conventional techniques. An extracutaneous fixation ring clamp encircles and firmly secures the vas without penetrating the skin. A sharp curved hemostat punctures and dilates the scrotal skin and vas sheath. The vas is delivered, cleaned and occluded by the surgeon's preferred technique. The contralateral vas is delivered through the same opening. The puncture wound contracts to about 2 mm., is not visible to the man and requires no sutures for closure. The reported incidence of hematoma in 179,741 men followed in China was 0.09%. No hematomas or infections were identified in the first 273 procedures performed by a surgeon in the United States. The operating time in China and for the last 50 United States procedures has ranged from 5 to 11 minutes. The disadvantage of the technique is the hand-on training and number of cases necessary to gain proficiency. However, the advantages for surgeons and patients should enhance the popularity of vasectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1988727     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38334-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  34 in total

1.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY AND STANDARD INCISIONAL VASECTOMY.

Authors:  A S Sandhu; P R Kao
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

2.  A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intraoperative saline perfusion on postvasectomy azoospermia.

Authors:  Brian Eisner; Timothy Schuster; Phillip Rodgers; Muzammil Ahmed; Gary Faerber; Gary Smith; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo; Laureen M Lopez; Huib A A M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

4.  Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary for no scalpel vasectomy.

Authors:  V Seenu; Abdul Hafiz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Minimally invasive vas surgery using a newly designed double-ringed clamp.

Authors:  Hyun Joon Moon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Vasectomy techniques--need for better occlusion methods.

Authors:  David C Sokal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Update on vasectomy protocol.

Authors:  Doron S Stember; Harris M Nagler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Huib A A M Van Vliet; Laureen M Lopez; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

Review 10.  [Hydrocele, spermatocele, and vasectomy: management of complications].

Authors:  S Kliesch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.