OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess whether intermittent impedance of inspiratory gas exchange improves the efficiency of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). BACKGROUND: Standard CPR relies on the natural elastic recoil of the chest to transiently decrease intrathoracic pressures and thereby promote venous blood return to the heart. To further enhance the negative intrathoracic pressures during the "relaxation" phase of CPR, we tested the hypothesis that intermittent impedance to inspiratory gases during standard CPR increases coronary perfusion pressures and vital organ perfusion. METHODS: CPR was performed with a pneumatically driven automated device in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. Eight pigs were randomized to initially receive standard CPR alone, while seven pigs initially received standard CPR plus intermittent impedance to inspiratory gas exchange with a threshold valve set to -40 cm H2O. The compression:ventilation ratio was 5:1 and the compression rate was 80/min. At 7-min intervals the impedance threshold valve (ITV) was either added or removed from the ventilation circuit such that during the 28 min of CPR, each animal received two 7-min periods of CPR with the ITV and two 7-min periods without the valve. RESULTS: Vital organ blood flow was significantly higher during CPR performed with the ITV than during CPR performed without the valve. Total left ventricular blood flow (mean+/-SEM) (mL/min/g) was 0.32+/-0.04 vs 0.23+/-0.03 without the ITV (p<0.05). Cerebral blood flow (mL/min/g) was 20% higher with the ITV (+ITV, 0.23+/-0.02; -ITV, 0.19+/-0.02; p<0.05). Each time the ITV was removed, there was a statistically significant decrease in the vital organ blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent impedance to inspiratory flow of respiratory gases during standard CPR significantly improves CPR efficiency during ventricular fibrillation. These studies underscore the importance of lowering intrathoracic pressures during the relaxation phase of CPR.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess whether intermittent impedance of inspiratory gas exchange improves the efficiency of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). BACKGROUND: Standard CPR relies on the natural elastic recoil of the chest to transiently decrease intrathoracic pressures and thereby promote venous blood return to the heart. To further enhance the negative intrathoracic pressures during the "relaxation" phase of CPR, we tested the hypothesis that intermittent impedance to inspiratory gases during standard CPR increases coronary perfusion pressures and vital organ perfusion. METHODS: CPR was performed with a pneumatically driven automated device in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. Eight pigs were randomized to initially receive standard CPR alone, while seven pigs initially received standard CPR plus intermittent impedance to inspiratory gas exchange with a threshold valve set to -40 cm H2O. The compression:ventilation ratio was 5:1 and the compression rate was 80/min. At 7-min intervals the impedance threshold valve (ITV) was either added or removed from the ventilation circuit such that during the 28 min of CPR, each animal received two 7-min periods of CPR with the ITV and two 7-min periods without the valve. RESULTS: Vital organ blood flow was significantly higher during CPR performed with the ITV than during CPR performed without the valve. Total left ventricular blood flow (mean+/-SEM) (mL/min/g) was 0.32+/-0.04 vs 0.23+/-0.03 without the ITV (p<0.05). Cerebral blood flow (mL/min/g) was 20% higher with the ITV (+ITV, 0.23+/-0.02; -ITV, 0.19+/-0.02; p<0.05). Each time the ITV was removed, there was a statistically significant decrease in the vital organ blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent impedance to inspiratory flow of respiratory gases during standard CPR significantly improves CPR efficiency during ventricular fibrillation. These studies underscore the importance of lowering intrathoracic pressures during the relaxation phase of CPR.
Authors: Victor A Convertino; Duane A Ratliff; Kathy L Ryan; William H Cooke; Donald F Doerr; David A Ludwig; Gary W Muniz; Deanna L Britton; Savran D Clah; Kathleen B Fernald; Alicia F Ruiz; Ahamed Idris; Keith G Lurie Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Victor A Convertino; Duane A Ratliff; Jacqueline Crissey; Donald F Doerr; Ahamed H Idris; Keith G Lurie Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Carly Alexander; Charles Lick; Brent Myers; Laurie Romig; Levon Vartanian; Joseph Stothert; Scott McKnite; Tim Matsuura; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith Lurie Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Peter J Kudenchuk; Jerris R Hedges; Graham Nichol; Richard E Kerber; Paul Dorian; Daniel P Davis; Ahamed H Idris; Clifton W Callaway; Scott Emerson; Ian G Stiell; Thomas E Terndrup Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Benedict Kjaergaard; Hans O Holdgaard; Sigridur O Magnusdottir; Søren Lundbye-Christensen; Erika F Christensen Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Jason A Bartos; Brian Grunau; Claire Carlson; Sue Duval; Adrian Ripeckyj; Rajat Kalra; Ganesh Raveendran; Ranjit John; Marc Conterato; Ralph J Frascone; Alexander Trembley; Tom P Aufderheide; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jens Nee; Roland Koerner; Daniel Zickler; Tim Schroeder; Philipp Enghard; Lutz Nibbe; Dietrich Hasper; Robert Buder; Christoph Leithner; Christoph J Ploner; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Christian Storm; Jan M Kruse Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 2.953