Literature DB >> 21160680

Use of the impedance threshold device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Theano D Demestiha1, Ioannis N Pantazopoulos, Theodoros T Xanthos.   

Abstract

Although approximately one million sudden cardiac deaths occur yearly in the US and Europe, cardiac arrest (CA) remains a clinical condition still characterized by a poor prognosis. In an effort to improve the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) technique, the 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for CPR gave the impedance threshold device (ITD) a Class IIa recommendation. The AHA recommendation means that there is strong evidence to demonstrate that ITD enhances circulation, improves hemodynamics and increases the likelihood of resuscitation in patients in CA. During standard CPR, venous blood return to the heart relies on the natural elastic recoil of the chest which creates a transient decrease in intrathoracic pressure. The ITD further decreases intrathoracic pressure by preventing respiratory gases from entering the lungs during the decompression phase of CPR. Thus, although ITD is placed into the respiratory circuit it works as a circulatory enhancer device that provides its therapeutic benefit with each chest decompression. The ease of use of this device, its ability to be incorporated into a mask and other airway devices, the absence of device-related adverse effects and few requirements in additional training, suggest that ITD may be a favorable new device for improving CPR efficiency. Since the literature is short of studies with clinically meaningful outcomes such as neurological outcome and long term survival, further evidence is still needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Coronary perfusion pressure; Impedance threshold device; Return of spontaneous circulation; Survival

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160680      PMCID: PMC2998865          DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i2.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Cardiol


  53 in total

1.  Effects of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the inspiratory threshold valve in a young porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Wolfgang G Voelckel; Keith G Lurie; Mike Sweeney; Scott McKnite; Todd Zielinski; Paul Lindstrom; Colleen Peterson; Volker Wenzel; Karl H Lindner
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 2.  Controversial issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  C L Schleien; I D Berkowitz; R Traystman; M C Rogers
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Effect of an inspiratory impedance threshold device on hemodynamics during conventional manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Ronald G Pirrallo; Tom P Aufderheide; Terry A Provo; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Use of the Impedance Threshold Device (ITD).

Authors:  Demetris Yannopoulos; Tom P Aufderheide
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Optimizing standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve.

Authors:  K G Lurie; K A Mulligan; S McKnite; B Detloff; P Lindstrom; K H Lindner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Cellular mechanism of the modulation of contractile function by coronary perfusion pressure in ferret hearts.

Authors:  M Kitakaze; E Marban
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mechanisms by which epinephrine augments cerebral and myocardial perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs.

Authors:  J R Michael; A D Guerci; R C Koehler; A Y Shi; J Tsitlik; N Chandra; E Niedermeyer; M C Rogers; R J Traystman; M L Weisfeldt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effects of an impedance threshold device on hemodynamics and restoration of spontaneous circulation in prolonged porcine ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  James J Menegazzi; David D Salcido; Michael T Menegazzi; Jon C Rittenberger; Brian P Suffoletto; Eric S Logue; Timothy J Mader
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of 15:2 and 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratios for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Demetris Yannopoulos; Tom P Aufderheide; Andrea Gabrielli; David G Beiser; Scott H McKnite; Ronald G Pirrallo; Jane Wigginton; Lance Becker; Terry Vanden Hoek; Wanchun Tang; Vinay M Nadkarni; John P Klein; Ahamed H Idris; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Brain metabolism during cardiopulmonary resuscitation assessed with microdialysis.

Authors:  Ludger Bahlmann; Stefan Klaus; Wolfgang Baumeier; Peter Schmucker; Claus Raedler; Christian A Schmittinger; Volker Wenzel; Wolfgang Voelckel; Karl H Lindner
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  2 in total

1.  An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on impedance threshold devices in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  G Biondi-Zoccai; A Abbate; G Landoni; A Zangrillo; J L Vincent; F D'Ascenzo; G Frati
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Oxygenation, ventilation, and airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a review.

Authors:  Tomas Henlin; Pavel Michalek; Tomas Tyll; John D Hinds; Milos Dobias
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.