Literature DB >> 22487997

Improved cerebral perfusion pressures and 24-hr neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure.

Anja K Metzger1, Margot Herman, Scott McKnite, Wanchun Tang, Demetris Yannopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Generation of negative intrathoracic pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation enhances the refilling of the heart. We tested the hypothesis that when compared with closed-chest manual compressions at 80 chest compressions per min, treatment with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min combined with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure would lower intracranial pressure and increase cerebral perfusion, thereby improving neurologically intact survival rates following prolonged untreated cardiac arrest.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized animal study.
SETTING: Animal laboratory facilities.
SUBJECTS: A total of 26 female farm pigs in two different protocols (n = 17 and n = 9). INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN
RESULTS: Seventeen pigs were subjected to 8.5 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and prospectively randomized to cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min plus an impedance threshold device. Coronary perfusion pressures (29.5 ± 2.7 mm Hg vs. 22.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg, p = .03), carotid blood flow (44.0 ± 12.2 vs. 30.9 ± 10.4, p = .03), and 24-hr neurological survival (88% vs. 22%, p = .015) were higher with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device. Cerebral perfusion pressures, measured in nine additional pigs, were improved with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device (21.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg vs. 8.9 ± 0.8 mm Hg, p < .0001). With active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device, mean diastolic intracranial pressure during decompression was lower (12.2 ± 0.2 mm Hg vs. 16.6 ± 1.2 mm Hg, p = .02) and the downward slope of the decompression phase intracranial pressure curve was steeper (-60.3 ± 12.9 mm Hg vs. -46.7 ± 11.1 mm Hg/sec, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device increased cerebral perfusion pressures and lowered diastolic intracranial pressure and intracranial pressure rate during the decompression phase. These mechanisms may underlie the observed increase in cerebral perfusion pressure, carotid blood flow, and survival rates with favorable neurologic outcomes in this pig model of cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22487997      PMCID: PMC3741964          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318246b9ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  23 in total

1.  Improving standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  K G Lurie; W G Voelckel; T Zielinski; S McKnite; P Lindstrom; C Peterson; V Wenzel; K H Lindner; N Samniah; D Benditt
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Effects of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the inspiratory threshold valve in a young porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Wolfgang G Voelckel; Keith G Lurie; Mike Sweeney; Scott McKnite; Todd Zielinski; Paul Lindstrom; Colleen Peterson; Volker Wenzel; Karl H Lindner
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Improving the efficiency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve.

Authors:  K Lurie; T Zielinski; S McKnite; P Sukhum
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Evaluation of a prototypic inspiratory impedance threshold valve designed to enhance the efficiency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Keith G Lurie; Thomas A Barnes; Todd M Zielinski; Scott H McKnite
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.258

5.  Inspiratory impedance during active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized evaluation in patients in cardiac arrest.

Authors:  P Plaisance; K G Lurie; D Payen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Use of an inspiratory impedance threshold valve during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a progress report.

Authors:  K Lurie; W Voelckel; P Plaisance; T Zielinski; S McKnite; D Kor; A Sugiyama; P Sukhum
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Ralph J Frascone; Marvin A Wayne; Brian D Mahoney; Robert A Swor; Robert M Domeier; Michael L Olinger; Richard G Holcomb; David E Tupper; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Use of an inspiratory impedance valve improves neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Keith G Lurie; Todd Zielinski; Scott McKnite; Tom Aufderheide; Wolfgang Voelckel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the combination of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Benno B Wolcke; Dietmar K Mauer; Mark F Schoefmann; Heinke Teichmann; Terry A Provo; Karl H Lindner; Wolfgang F Dick; Dorothee Aeppli; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Evaluation of an impedance threshold device in patients receiving active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out of hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Patrick Plaisance; Keith G Lurie; Eric Vicaut; Dominique Martin; Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud; Jean-Luc Petit; Didier Payen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Personalized physiology-guided resuscitation in highly monitored patients with cardiac arrest-the PERSEUS resuscitation protocol.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalkias; Eleni Arnaoutoglou; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Enhanced perfusion during advanced life support improves survival with favorable neurologic function in a porcine model of refractory cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Guillaume Debaty; Anja Metzger; Jennifer Rees; Scott McKnite; Laura Puertas; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith Lurie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Efficacy of heads-up CPR compared to supine CPR positions: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Varney; Karam R Motawea; Mostafa R Mostafa; Yossef H AbdelQadir; Merna Aboelenein; Omneya A Kandil; Nancy Ibrahim; Hashim T Hashim; Kimberly Murry; Garrett Jackson; Jaffer Shah; Maty Boury; Ahmed K Awad; Priya Patel; Dina M Awad; Samah S Rozan; Nesreen E Talat
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24

4.  Hydrogen sulfide inhalation decreases early blood-brain barrier permeability and brain edema induced by cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Authors:  Yingjie Geng; Eerdunmutu Li; Qier Mu; Yu Zhang; Xia Wei; Hangbing Li; Long Cheng; Bing Zhang
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Controlled progressive elevation rather than an optimal angle maximizes cerebral perfusion pressure during head up CPR in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Michael Lick; Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Nicolas Segal; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Hemodynamic directed CPR improves cerebral perfusion pressure and brain tissue oxygenation.

Authors:  Stuart H Friess; Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Utpal Bhalala; Matthew R Maltese; Maryam Y Naim; George Bratinov; Silvana Arciniegas Rodriguez; Theodore R Weiland; Mia Garuccio; Vinay M Nadkarni; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Treatment of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus an impedance threshold device.

Authors:  Ralph J Frascone; Marvin A Wayne; Robert A Swor; Brian D Mahoney; Robert M Domeier; Michael L Olinger; David E Tupper; Cindy M Setum; Nathan Burkhart; Lucinda Klann; Joshua G Salzman; Sandi S Wewerka; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith G Lurie; Brian J O'Neil; Richard G Holcomb; Tom P Aufderheide
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 8.  Enhancing cardiac arrest survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: insights into the process of death.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Effect of controlled sequential elevation timing of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Michael Lick; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Closed-loop machine-controlled CPR system optimises haemodynamics during prolonged CPR.

Authors:  Pierre S Sebastian; Marinos N Kosmopoulos; Manan Gandhi; Alex Oshin; Matthew D Olson; Adrian Ripeckyj; Logan Bahmer; Jason A Bartos; Evangelos A Theodorou; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.