OBJECTIVE: Generation of negative intrathoracic pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation enhances the refilling of the heart. We tested the hypothesis that when compared with closed-chest manual compressions at 80 chest compressions per min, treatment with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min combined with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure would lower intracranial pressure and increase cerebral perfusion, thereby improving neurologically intact survival rates following prolonged untreated cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized animal study. SETTING: Animal laboratory facilities. SUBJECTS: A total of 26 female farm pigs in two different protocols (n = 17 and n = 9). INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen pigs were subjected to 8.5 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and prospectively randomized to cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min plus an impedance threshold device. Coronary perfusion pressures (29.5 ± 2.7 mm Hg vs. 22.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg, p = .03), carotid blood flow (44.0 ± 12.2 vs. 30.9 ± 10.4, p = .03), and 24-hr neurological survival (88% vs. 22%, p = .015) were higher with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device. Cerebral perfusion pressures, measured in nine additional pigs, were improved with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device (21.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg vs. 8.9 ± 0.8 mm Hg, p < .0001). With active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device, mean diastolic intracranial pressure during decompression was lower (12.2 ± 0.2 mm Hg vs. 16.6 ± 1.2 mm Hg, p = .02) and the downward slope of the decompression phase intracranial pressure curve was steeper (-60.3 ± 12.9 mm Hg vs. -46.7 ± 11.1 mm Hg/sec, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device increased cerebral perfusion pressures and lowered diastolic intracranial pressure and intracranial pressure rate during the decompression phase. These mechanisms may underlie the observed increase in cerebral perfusion pressure, carotid blood flow, and survival rates with favorable neurologic outcomes in this pig model of cardiac arrest.
OBJECTIVE: Generation of negative intrathoracic pressure during the decompression phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation enhances the refilling of the heart. We tested the hypothesis that when compared with closed-chest manual compressions at 80 chest compressions per min, treatment with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min combined with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure would lower intracranial pressure and increase cerebral perfusion, thereby improving neurologically intact survival rates following prolonged untreated cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized animal study. SETTING: Animal laboratory facilities. SUBJECTS: A total of 26 female farm pigs in two different protocols (n = 17 and n = 9). INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen pigs were subjected to 8.5 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and prospectively randomized to cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation at 80 chest compressions/min plus an impedance threshold device. Coronary perfusion pressures (29.5 ± 2.7 mm Hg vs. 22.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg, p = .03), carotid blood flow (44.0 ± 12.2 vs. 30.9 ± 10.4, p = .03), and 24-hr neurological survival (88% vs. 22%, p = .015) were higher with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device. Cerebral perfusion pressures, measured in nine additional pigs, were improved with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device (21.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg vs. 8.9 ± 0.8 mm Hg, p < .0001). With active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device, mean diastolic intracranial pressure during decompression was lower (12.2 ± 0.2 mm Hg vs. 16.6 ± 1.2 mm Hg, p = .02) and the downward slope of the decompression phase intracranial pressure curve was steeper (-60.3 ± 12.9 mm Hg vs. -46.7 ± 11.1 mm Hg/sec, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + an impedance threshold device increased cerebral perfusion pressures and lowered diastolic intracranial pressure and intracranial pressure rate during the decompression phase. These mechanisms may underlie the observed increase in cerebral perfusion pressure, carotid blood flow, and survival rates with favorable neurologic outcomes in this pig model of cardiac arrest.
Authors: K G Lurie; W G Voelckel; T Zielinski; S McKnite; P Lindstrom; C Peterson; V Wenzel; K H Lindner; N Samniah; D Benditt Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Wolfgang G Voelckel; Keith G Lurie; Mike Sweeney; Scott McKnite; Todd Zielinski; Paul Lindstrom; Colleen Peterson; Volker Wenzel; Karl H Lindner Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: K Lurie; W Voelckel; P Plaisance; T Zielinski; S McKnite; D Kor; A Sugiyama; P Sukhum Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Ralph J Frascone; Marvin A Wayne; Brian D Mahoney; Robert A Swor; Robert M Domeier; Michael L Olinger; Richard G Holcomb; David E Tupper; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith G Lurie Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Benno B Wolcke; Dietmar K Mauer; Mark F Schoefmann; Heinke Teichmann; Terry A Provo; Karl H Lindner; Wolfgang F Dick; Dorothee Aeppli; Keith G Lurie Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Guillaume Debaty; Anja Metzger; Jennifer Rees; Scott McKnite; Laura Puertas; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith Lurie Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Joseph Varney; Karam R Motawea; Mostafa R Mostafa; Yossef H AbdelQadir; Merna Aboelenein; Omneya A Kandil; Nancy Ibrahim; Hashim T Hashim; Kimberly Murry; Garrett Jackson; Jaffer Shah; Maty Boury; Ahmed K Awad; Priya Patel; Dina M Awad; Samah S Rozan; Nesreen E Talat Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-24
Authors: Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Michael Lick; Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Nicolas Segal; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Stuart H Friess; Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Utpal Bhalala; Matthew R Maltese; Maryam Y Naim; George Bratinov; Silvana Arciniegas Rodriguez; Theodore R Weiland; Mia Garuccio; Vinay M Nadkarni; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Ralph J Frascone; Marvin A Wayne; Robert A Swor; Brian D Mahoney; Robert M Domeier; Michael L Olinger; David E Tupper; Cindy M Setum; Nathan Burkhart; Lucinda Klann; Joshua G Salzman; Sandi S Wewerka; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith G Lurie; Brian J O'Neil; Richard G Holcomb; Tom P Aufderheide Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2021-02-20 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Michael Lick; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Pierre S Sebastian; Marinos N Kosmopoulos; Manan Gandhi; Alex Oshin; Matthew D Olson; Adrian Ripeckyj; Logan Bahmer; Jason A Bartos; Evangelos A Theodorou; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2020-08-12