Literature DB >> 17219212

The treatment of transtrochanteric fractures of the femur with a minimally invasive technique using an extramedullary implant MINUS System.

Rogério Naim Sawaia1, William Dias Belangero.   

Abstract

We report here the results of a retrospective study on 120 patients treated for transtrochanteric fractures of the femur using a minimally invasive technique with an extramedullary sliding pin as implant - which we denoted the MINUS System. The evaluation was carried out in in the postoperative period, and the levels of haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Ht), surgical time, radiological screening time and pain levels were recorded. Prior to the operation, mean Hb and Ht were 11.69 g/dl and 35.72%, respectively; in the immediate postoperative period, they were 10.35 g/dl and 32.4%, respectively. Mean operating time was 39.35 min. Average postoperative pain was assessed at 4.44 (on a scale of 1 to 10). The average time for screening was 1.07 min. Based on these criteria, we conclude that the minimally invasive technique of the MINUS System allows for a shorter operating time and a minimal blood loss in the treatment of transtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17219212      PMCID: PMC2269014          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0304-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

1.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  S H Bridle; A D Patel; M Bircher; P T Calvert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-03

2.  Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients.

Authors:  K J Koval; M L Skovron; G B Aharonoff; S E Meadows; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ten commandments for effective consultations.

Authors:  L Goldman; T Lee; P Rudd
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1983-09

5.  Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation.

Authors:  M J Curtis; R H Jinnah; V Wilson; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Patients with femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures. Are they the same?

Authors:  K J Koval; G B Aharonoff; A S Rokito; T Lyon; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A new device for the fixation of unstable pertrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  R J Medoff; K Maes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail.

Authors:  P J Radford; M Needoff; J K Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

9.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog; J M Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The influence of age on the morphology of trochanteric fracture.

Authors:  B S Zain Elabdien; S Olerud; G Karlström
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1984
View more
  2 in total

1.  Internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures using DHS with a two-hole side-plate.

Authors:  Daniel Ríha; Jan Bartonícek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  THE MINUS(®) SYSTEM MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUE FOR THE TREATMENT OF TRANTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES.

Authors:  Rogério Naim Sawaia; William Dias Belangero
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.