Literature DB >> 9552905

Point of care testing: randomised controlled trial of clinical outcome.

J Kendall1, B Reeves, M Clancy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the proportion of patients attending an accident and emergency department for whom blood analysis at the point of care brought about a change in management; to measure the extent to which point of care testing resulted in differences in clinical outcome for these patients when compared with patients whose samples were tested by the hospital laboratory.
DESIGN: Open, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Blood samples were randomly allocated to point of care testing or testing by the hospital's central laboratory.
SETTING: The accident and emergency department of the Bristol Royal Infirmary, a large teaching hospital which cares for an inner city population.
SUBJECTS: Representative sample of patients who attended the department between April 1996 and April 1997 and who required blood tests. Data collection was structured in 8 hour blocks so that all hours of the day and all days of the week were equally represented. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients for whom point of care testing brought about a change in treatment in which timing was considered to be critical to clinical outcome. Mortality, the length of stay in hospital, admission rate, the amount of time spent waiting for results of blood tests, the amount of time taken to decide on management plans, and the amount of time patients spent in the department were compared between patients whose samples were tested at the point of care and those whose samples were sent to the laboratory.
RESULTS: Samples were obtained from 1728 patients. Changes in management in which timing was considered to be critical occurred in 59 out of 859 (6.9%, 95% confidence interval 5.3% to 8.8%) patients in the point of care arm of the trial. Decisions were made 74 minutes earlier (68 min to 80 min, P < 0.0001) when point of care testing was used for haematological tests as compared to central laboratory testing, 86 minutes earlier (80 min to 92 min, P < 0.0001) for biochemical tests, and 21 minutes earlier (-3 min to 44 min, P = 0.09) for analyses of arterial blood gases. There were no differences between the groups in the amount of time spent in the department, length of stay in hospital, admission rates, or mortality.
CONCLUSION: Point of care testing reduced the time taken to make decisions on patient management that were dependent on the results of blood tests. It also brought about faster changes in treatment for which timing was considered to be critical in about 7% of patients. These changes did not affect clinical outcome or the amount of time patients spent in the department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9552905      PMCID: PMC28507          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  15 in total

1.  Automated approaches to rapid-response testing. A comparative evaluation of point-of-care and centralized laboratory testing.

Authors:  M Fleisher; M K Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Point-of-care testing.

Authors:  P J Santrach; M F Burritt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Point-of-care testing: does it really improve patient care.

Authors:  M Fleisher
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.281

4.  Point of care laboratory testing in the emergency department.

Authors:  P Jatlow
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  The evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in the emergency department.

Authors:  J Woo; J B McCabe; D Chauncey; T Schug; J B Henry
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Does the emergency department need a dedicated stat laboratory? Continuous quality improvement as a management tool for the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  S Saxena; E T Wong
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Analytical evaluation of i-STAT Portable Clinical Analyzer and use by nonlaboratory health-care professionals.

Authors:  E Jacobs; E Vadasdi; L Sarkozi; N Colman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Minimizing admission laboratory testing in trauma patients: use of a microanalyzer.

Authors:  H L Frankel; G S Rozycki; M G Ochsner; J E McCabe; J D Harviel; J C Jeng; H R Champion
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1994-11

9.  Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center.

Authors:  W W Tsai; D B Nash; B Seamonds; G J Weir
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Bedside blood gas and electrolyte monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G P Zaloga; T R Hill; R A Strickland; D Kennedy; M Visser; K Ford; J Whitley; G Holt; C Booker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care.

Authors:  B C Delaney; C J Hyde; R J McManus; S Wilson; D A Fitzmaurice; S Jowett; R Tobias; G H Thorpe; F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 2.  Near patient testing and pathology in the new millennium.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Point of care testing.

Authors:  C P Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

Review 4.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; M Crook; M L Tillyer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Identifying the research question and planning the project.

Authors:  J Wyatt; H Guly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  The Evidence to Support Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2010-08

7.  Laboratory turnaround time.

Authors:  Robert C Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-11

8.  If devolved facilities are used, processes may be streamlined.

Authors:  T Heymann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-19

9.  Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care analyzer in critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  Jacoline Steinfelder-Visscher; Steven Teerenstra; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Patrick W Weerwind
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-03

10.  Improving access to diagnostics: an evaluation of a satellite laboratory service in the emergency department.

Authors:  P Leman; D Guthrie; R Simpson; F Little
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.