Literature DB >> 9552107

Back and hip extensor fatigability in chronic low back pain patients and controls.

M Kankaanpää1, S Taimela, D Laaksonen, O Hänninen, O Airaksinen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lumbar paraspinal and gluteus maximus muscle fatigability between chronic low back pain patients and healthy controls by using electromyographic (EMG) spectral analysis during a maximal isometric endurance task.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative study between chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.
SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic in Finland.
SUBJECTS: Twenty women with nonspecific chronic low back pain (longer than 3 months) and 15 healthy controls. INTERVENTION: Subjects performed maximal voluntary isometric back extensions (MVC) at 30 degrees forward flexion in a specially designed measurement unit. A 50% MVC load was used in isometric endurance test. OUTCOME MEASURES: Low back pain intensity was assessed by using the visual analogue scale and functional disability by the Oswestry disability index. Time to endurance was measured. Bipolar surface EMG recordings were made over the lumbar paraspinal muscles (L3-L4, L5-S1) and over the gluteus maximus muscles. Average EMG (aEMG%), and initial spectral median frequency (MFinit) and change over time (MFslope) were computed.
RESULTS: Pain intensity and functional disability were higher and MVC and time to endurance were lower in the chronic low back pain group (p < .05). Similar muscle activity levels (aEMG%) and MFinit indicated similar muscle loading in both groups at the beginning of the endurance test. EMG spectral decreases (MFslope) indicated that lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigability was similar in both groups. In the chronic low back pain group, the gluteus maximus fatigued faster than in the control group (greater MFslope, p < .05). However, the shorter endurance time indicated greater fatigability in the chronic low back pain group in general (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The chronic low back pain patients were weaker and fatigued faster than the healthy controls. The EMG fatigue analysis results suggest that the gluteus maximus muscles are more fatigable in chronic low back pain patients than in healthy control subjects during a sustained back extension endurance test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9552107     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90142-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  53 in total

1.  Fatigue sensation, electromyographical and hemodynamic changes of low back muscles during repeated static contraction.

Authors:  Mehrnoosh Movahed; Jun-ya Ohashi; Nopporn Kurustien; Hiroyuki Izumi; Masaharu Kumashiro
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Fatigue-induced adaptive changes of anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Adam J Strang; William P Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The use of non-amplitude components of the myoelectric signal in identifying differences in function between the low back injured and controls.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-09

Review 4.  Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength.

Authors:  Angela E Hibbs; Kevin G Thompson; Duncan French; Allan Wrigley; Iain Spears
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  An investigation of leg and trunk strength and reaction times of hard-style martial arts practitioners.

Authors:  Oliver O Donovan; Jeanette Cheung; Maria Catley; Alison H McGregor; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  [Evaluation of the German new back school: muscular physiological characteristics].

Authors:  R Tutzschke; C Anders; C Borys; S Nodop; O Rößler; B Strauß; H C Scholle
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  Back and hip extensor muscles fatigue in healthy subjects: task-dependency effect of two variants of the Sorensen test.

Authors:  Annick Champagne; Martin Descarreaux; Danik Lafond
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Jogging kinematics after lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; D Casey Kerrigan; Julie M Fritz; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Trunk control during standing reach: A dynamical system analysis of movement strategies in patients with mechanical low back pain.

Authors:  Sheri P Silfies; Anand Bhattacharya; Scott Biely; Sue S Smith; Simon Giszter
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Axial back pain in the athlete: pathophysiology and approach to rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chad Carlson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2009-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.