Literature DB >> 17549122

The use of non-amplitude components of the myoelectric signal in identifying differences in function between the low back injured and controls.

Gregory J Lehman1.   

Abstract

This article primarily reviews the assessment of the non-amplitude dependent components of the myoelectric signal in assessing lumbar function in the low back injured and how persons with low back injuries may differ from the non-injured. Assessment of anomalies in function can loosely be categorized into 4 separate protocols: 1. Assessing the pattern of myoelectric activation, 2. Assessing the EMG frequency spectrum during fatigue, 3. Assessing EMG onset timing during movement and stability challenges and 4. Assessing myoelectric function with link-segment models and EMG assisted spinal models. Assessing the EMG spectrum during fatigue can discriminate between populations; however, questions regarding across day repeatability limit its ability to identify change over time. The remaining techniques are relatively new, show statistically significant differences between the low back injured and normals and provide insight into aberrant spinal stability, motor control function and spinal loading. Their response to rehabilitation programs is largely unknown suggesting a need and avenue for future research.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 17549122      PMCID: PMC1769456     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc        ISSN: 0008-3194


  43 in total

1.  Dynamic testing of the motor stereotype in prone hip extension from neutral position.

Authors:  L Vogt; W Banzer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Factors in the reproducibility of electromyographic power spectrum analysis of lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  A V Nargol; A P Jones; P J Kelly; C G Greenough
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Muscular response to sudden load. A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation.

Authors:  D G Wilder; A R Aleksiev; M L Magnusson; M H Pope; K F Spratt; V K Goel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Reliability of spectral EMG parameters of healthy back extensors during submaximum isometric fatiguing contractions and recovery.

Authors:  J P Peach; J Gunning; S M McGill
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 5.  Endurance of trunk muscles in persons with chronic low back pain: assessment, performance, training.

Authors:  M T Moffroid
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1997-10

6.  The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability.

Authors:  M Kankaanpää; S Taimela; O Airaksinen; O Hänninen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Trunk muscle strength and back muscle endurance in construction workers with and without low back disorders.

Authors:  E Holmström; U Moritz; M Andersson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1992

9.  Decoupling of bilateral paraspinal excitation in subjects with low back pain.

Authors:  M D Grabiner; T J Koh; A el Ghazawi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Exercise treatment for sacroiliac pain.

Authors:  V Mooney; R Pozos; A Vleeming; J Gulick; D Swenski
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.