Literature DB >> 9551018

Evaluation of a public-private certified nurse-midwife maternity program for indigent women.

D Lenaway1, T D Koepsell, T Vaughan, G van Belle, K Shy, F Cruz-Uribe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the impact of a public-private certified nurse-midwife program on prenatal and delivery outcomes among medically indigent women.
METHODS: A population-based quasi-experimental design was used to compare 1 intervention county with 2 nonintervention counties.
RESULTS: The program significantly reduced the number of women who received no prenatal care and the risk of acquiring less than adequate prenatal care. Reductions in the proportion of infants born premature or with low birth-weights were of borderline significance. The use of induction and/or stimulation of labor was statistically elevated.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the intervention program was instrumental in reducing some, but not all, negative prenatal and delivery outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9551018      PMCID: PMC1508421          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  26 in total

1.  Effectiveness of certified nurse-midwives. A prospective evaluation study.

Authors:  C Slome; H Wetherbee; M Daly; K Christensen; M Meglen; H Thiede
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Reducing neonatal mortality rate with nurse-midwives.

Authors:  B S Levy; F S Wilkinson; W M Marine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Health care for the indigent: overview of critical issues.

Authors:  G J Bazzoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Factors associated with birthweight: an exploration of the roles of prenatal care and length of gestation.

Authors:  J A Showstack; P P Budetti; D Minkler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Randomization by group: a formal analysis.

Authors:  J Cornfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  An empirical study of cluster randomization.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Perinatal care and cost effectiveness: changes in health expenditures and birth outcome following the establishment of a nurse-midwife program.

Authors:  M L Reid; J B Morris
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Relation of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight. Maternal reports of health behavior advice and initial prenatal care procedures.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck; D A Nagey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments.

Authors:  Q E Whiting-O'Keefe; C Henke; D W Simborg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  American nurse-midwifery practice in 1976-1977: reflections of 50 years of growth and development.

Authors:  J B Rooks; S H Fischman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  2 in total

1.  Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.

Authors:  Sarah Benatar; A Bowen Garrett; Embry Howell; Ashley Palmer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Hollowell; Laura Oakley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Peter Brocklehurst; Ron Gray
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.