Literature DB >> 8158819

Relation of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight. Maternal reports of health behavior advice and initial prenatal care procedures.

M D Kogan1, G R Alexander, M Kotelchuck, D A Nagey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have found a relationship between the quantity of prenatal care received and birth outcomes. Few studies have had the opportunity to examine the content of prenatal care. This study examined the relationship between two components of the content of prenatal care: maternal reports of health behavior advice received and initial prenatal care procedures performed during the first two visits and low birth weight in a national sample of women. Advice and initial procedures were categorized based on the recommendations of the US Public Health Service Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care.
DESIGN: Interview survey of a nationally representative sample of women who had live births in 1988. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9394 women, with data from the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Low birth weight (< 2500 g) as reported on the birth certificate.
RESULTS: After controlling for other sociodemographic, utilization, medical, and behavioral factors, women who reported not receiving all the types of advice recommended by the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care were more likely to have a low-birth-weight infant compared with women who reported receiving the optimal level of advice (odds ratio = 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.60). There were no differences between women who reported receiving all the recommended initial prenatal care procedures and those who reported not receiving all recommended prenatal care (odds ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.14).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that women who report receiving sufficient health behavior advice as part of their prenatal care are at lower risk of delivering a low-birth-weight infant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8158819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  49 in total

1.  How well do we understand the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight?

Authors:  K D Frick; P M Lantz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Reducing preterm and low birthweight rates in the United States: is psychosocial assessment the answer?

Authors:  G R Alexander
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

3.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Delayed prenatal care and the risk of low birth weight delivery.

Authors:  William J Hueston; Gregory E Gilbert; Lucy Davis; Vanessa Sturgill
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-06

5.  Integrating the life course perspective into a local maternal and child health program.

Authors:  Cheri Pies; Padmini Parthasarathy; Samuel F Posner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

6.  Are clinical criteria just proxies for socioeconomic status? A study of low birth weight in Jamaica.

Authors:  J W Peabody; P J Gertler
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  A risk assessment screening test for very low birth weight.

Authors:  Ralitza V Gueorguieva; Neena P Sarkar; Randy L Carter; Mario Ariet; Jeffrey Roth; Michael B Resnick
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-06

8.  The relationship between prenatal health behavior advice and low birth weight.

Authors:  M R Sable; A A Herman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Determinants of the use of prenatal care in rural China: the role of care content.

Authors:  Bright I Nwaru; Zhuochun Wu; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

10.  Maternal smoking and adverse birth outcomes among singletons and twins.

Authors:  H Pollack; P M Lantz; J G Frohna
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.