Literature DB >> 9550564

Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer.

J Ben-Ezra1, L Bork, R A McPherson.   

Abstract

Urinalysis is a high-volume procedure that currently requires significant labor to examine microscopic sediment. We evaluated the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer for performing this task. Instrument accuracy was assessed by comparing continuous counts of microscopic elements from the UF-100 with ranges of cells (per low-power field or high-power field) from manual microscopy performed on centrifuged urines. Counts showed good agreement between methods (gamma statistic: 0.880-0.970) for all microscopic elements in 252 urine samples. Within-run imprecision of cell counts expressed as CV (mean cell count/microL) was for erythrocytes (RBC) 31% (5), 18% (50), 2.4% (800); for leukocytes (WBC) 14% (10), 11% (100), 8.5% (400); for squamous epithelial cells (SEC) 18% (5), 12% (30), 7.0% (100); for casts 45% (1), 17% (4); for bacteria 2-12% (entire range of 40-2500). Between-run imprecision on quality-control cell suspensions expressed as CV (mean cell count/microL) was for RBC 6.1% (50), 2.7% (256); for WBC 26.9% (54), 4.9% (228). Cells counted on dilution were 99.1% of expected for RBC, 102.0% for WBC, and 121.8% for bacteria. Carryover was <0.04% for RBC, <0.03% for WBC, <0.14% for SEC, <0.29% for bacteria. We conclude that the UF-100 can automatically perform reliable quantitative microscopic urinalysis in batches without operator interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9550564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  15 in total

1.  Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures.

Authors:  Z Zaman; S Roggeman; J Verhaegen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance Evaluation of Three URiSCAN Devices for Routine Urinalysis.

Authors:  Kiwoong Ko; Min-Jung Kwon; Seungho Ryu; Hee-Yeon Woo; Hyosoon Park
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.

Authors:  S Mayo; D Acevedo; C Quiñones-Torrelo; I Canós; M Sancho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Evaluation of the Alfred 60/AST device as a screening test for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Sophie Lahanas; George Stathopoulos; Raymond C Chan; Sebastiaan J van Hal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Screening of urine samples by flow cytometry reduces the need for culture.

Authors:  Santra Jolkkonen; Eeva-Liisa Paattiniemi; Pauliina Kärpänoja; Hannu Sarkkinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Enumeration of bacterial cell numbers and detection of significant bacteriuria by use of a new flow cytometry-based device.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okada; Toshiro Shirakawa; Akinobu Gotoh; Yutaka Kamiyama; Satoru Muto; Hisamitsu Ide; Yukio Hamaguchi; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Interobserver reliability of urine sediment interpretation.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Chaim M Bell; Rosane Nisenbaum; Samuel Perrone; Orfeas Liangos; Andreas Laupacis; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Pyuria associated with acute Kawasaki disease and fever from other causes.

Authors:  Hiroko Shike; John T Kanegaye; Brookie M Best; Joan Pancheri; Jane C Burns
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 9.  Urinalysis and urinary tract infection: update for clinicians.

Authors:  J L Young; D E Soper
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001

Review 10.  Preanalytical requirements of urinalysis.

Authors:  Joris Delanghe; Marijn Speeckaert
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.