Literature DB >> 9544505

The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay.

K M Higgins1, M Davidian, G Chew, H Burge.   

Abstract

A common practice in immunoassay is the use of sequential dilutions of an initial stock solution of the antigen of interest to obtain standard samples in a desired concentration range. Nonlinear, heteroscedastic regression models are a common framework for analysis, and the usual methods for fitting the model assume that measured responses on the standards are independent. However, the dilution procedure introduces a propagation of random measurement error that may invalidate this assumption. We demonstrate that failure to account for serial dilution error in calibration inference on unknown samples leads to serious inaccuracy of assessments of assay precision such as confidence intervals and precision profiles. Techniques for taking serial dilution error into account based on data from multiple assay runs are discussed and are shown to yield valid calibration inferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9544505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  A Bayesian approach for estimating calibration curves and unknown concentrations in immunoassays.

Authors:  Feng Feng; Ana Paula Sales; Thomas B Kepler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Two-Stage Experimental Design for Dose-Response Modeling in Toxicology Studies.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Feng Yang; Dale W Porter; Nianqiang Wu
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.198

3.  Treatment of batch in the detection, calibration, and quantification of immunoassays in large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Paul S Albert; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Modeling qRT-PCR dynamics with application to cancer biomarker quantification.

Authors:  Inna Chervoneva; Boris Freydin; Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  A two-stage experimental design for dilution assays.

Authors:  Jake M Ferguson; Tanya A Miura; Craig R Miller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Titer via a Power Family of Four-Parameter Logistic Model.

Authors:  Hongmei Yang; Jeanne Holden-Wiltse; David J Topham; John Treanor
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  An improved method for estimating antibody titers in microneutralization assay using green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Hongmei Yang; Steven F Baker; Mario E González; David J Topham; Luis Martínez-Sobrido; Martin Zand; Jeanne Holden-Wiltse; Hulin Wu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Comparison and validation of methods to quantify Cry1Ab toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis for standardization of insect bioassays.

Authors:  André L B Crespo; Terence A Spencer; Emily Nekl; Marianne Pusztai-Carey; William J Moar; Blair D Siegfried
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Statistical design for a small serial dilution series.

Authors:  Daniel Zelterman; Alexander Tulupyev; Robert Heimer; Nadia Abdala
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Challenges and improvements in testosterone and estradiol testing.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; Julianne C Botelho; Yuesong Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.