Literature DB >> 9536364

Comparison of fixation disparities obtained by objective and subjective methods.

N Fogt1, R Jones.   

Abstract

Fixation disparities (FD) were measured as a function of forced vergence using binocular scleral search coils and simultaneously with nonius lines. The slope of the objective FD curve was significantly greater than the subjective FD curve for three of five subjects. This indicates an alteration in retinal correspondence of up to one degree, that shifts Panum's area to avoid the diplopia normally present with large disparities. This process allows for fusion in the presence of large objective fixation disparities which would normally cause diplopia. The shift in correspondence enhances the range of forced vergence, since the larger objective FDs serve as more effective stimuli to fusional vergence. The remaining subjects who lacked this effect had "flat" FD curves indicative of high vergence adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536364     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00142-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Stereoacuity and binocular visual acuity in prism-induced exodeviation.

Authors:  Philip W Laird; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  A unified model for binocular fusion and depth perception.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Comparisons of proximal vergence measures.

Authors:  Nick Fogt
Journal:  Vis Dev Rehabil       Date:  2020-09

5.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Where do the eyes really go in the hollow-face illusion?

Authors:  Marc Grosjean; Gerhard Rinkenauer; Stephanie Jainta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quantitative Approach for the Analysis of Fusional Convergence Using Eye-Tracking and SacLab Toolbox.

Authors:  Laura Cercenelli; Michela Fresina; Barbara Bortolani; Guido Tiberi; Giuseppe Giannaccare; E C Campos; Emanuela Marcelli
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?

Authors:  Ketan R Parmar; Christine Dickinson; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.