Literature DB >> 9524899

Systolic pressure variation predicts the response to acute blood loss.

E Ornstein1, L A Eidelman, B Drenger, A Elami, R Pizov.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systolic pressure variation (SPV), defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum systolic blood pressure measured during a controlled mechanical respiratory cycle, as a predictor of the cardiac output (CO) response to an acute decrease in ventricular preload.
DESIGN: Prospective study with each subject serving as his or her own control.
SETTING: Cardiac surgery operating rooms of a university medical center. PATIENTS: 15 adults with good ventricular function undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. INTERVENTION: During stable anesthetic conditions and before surgical stimulation, 500 ml of blood was removed from each patient over 10 minutes.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CO, central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and SPV before and after phlebotomy were recorded. Phlebotomy was associated with significant decreases in CVP, PAOP, and CO, and an increase in SPV. Of these variables, SPV was the best predictor of the percent decrease in CO resulting from blood loss.
CONCLUSION: SPV is a dynamic measurement, which, by revealing the response to small cyclical changes in left ventricular preload that occur during the controlled mechanical respiratory cycle, is a better predictor than central filling pressures of the response of CO to acute decreases in preload that occur as a result of acute blood loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9524899     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00257-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Jacques-A Romand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Pulse-plethysmographic variables in hemodynamic assessment during mannitol infusion.

Authors:  M Radhakrishnan; K Mohanvelu; S Veena; G Sripathy; G S Umamaheswara Rao
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Analysis of the ear pulse oximeter waveform.

Authors:  Aymen A Awad; Robert G Stout; M Ashraf M Ghobashy; Hoda A Rezkanna; David G Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  It's time to measure intra-abdominal pressure to optimize hemodynamics!

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Enrico Calzia; Pierre Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Impact of withdrawal of 450 ml of blood on respiration-induced oscillations of the ear plethysmographic waveform.

Authors:  Michael J Gesquiere; Aymen A Awad; David G Silverman; Robert G Stout; Denis H Jablonka; Tyler J Silverman; Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  The pleth variability index as an indicator of the central extracellular fluid volume in mechanically ventilated patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with initial distribution volume of glucose.

Authors:  Wenqing Lu; Jing Dong; Zifeng Xu; Hao Shen; Jijian Zheng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-03-08

Review 7.  Computer says 2.5 litres--how best to incorporate intelligent software into clinical decision making in the intensive care unit?

Authors:  Katie Lane; Owen Boyd
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Marcel R Lopes; Jose-Otavio C Auler
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  Rupert M Pearse; Kashif Ikram; John Barry
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Non-invasive detection of hypovolemia or fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing subjects.

Authors:  Eva Zöllei; Viktória Bertalan; Andrea Németh; Péter Csábi; Ildikó László; József Kaszaki; László Rudas
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.217

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.