Literature DB >> 9519697

When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition.

D C Bourassa1, D Besner.   

Abstract

Three lexical decision experiments examined the conditions in which nonwords activate semantics. Lexical decisions to targets (e.g., CAT) were faster when preceded by semantically related nonword primes (e.g., DEG derived from DOG) when the prime was brief and masked; this nonword priming effect was eliminated when the prime was presented for a longer duration. These results are discussed in the context of both parallel distributed processing models and the idea that the occurrence of nonword priming depends upon subjects being unable to verify the identity of the prime.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519697     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; L J Evett; P T Quinlan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition.

Authors:  M F Lesch; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Evidence against early selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays.

Authors:  P Fera; P Jolicoeur; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition.

Authors:  K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

Review 9.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  G E Hinton; T Shallice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  8 in total

1.  Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony.

Authors:  M Perea; E Rosa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  The Relationship Between Non-Orthographic Language Abilities and Reading Performance in Chronic Aphasia: An Exploration of the Primary Systems Hypothesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brookshire Madden; Tim Conway; Maya L Henry; Kristie A Spencer; Kathryn M Yorkston; Diane L Kendall
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

4.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

5.  Does LGHT prime DARK? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

6.  Does a pear growl? Interference from semantic properties of orthographic neighbors.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Jimmy de Rooij; René Zeelenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07

7.  The neural dynamics associated with lexicality effect in reading single Chinese words, pseudo-words and non-words.

Authors:  Fei Gao; Jianqin Wang; Chenggang Wu; Meng-Yun Wang; Juan Zhang; Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.381

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.