Literature DB >> 9519696

The effects on priming of word frequency, number of repetitions, and delay depend on the magnitude of priming.

A L Ostergaard1.   

Abstract

Conflicting findings with respect to the effects of experimental manipulations on priming have been reported in previous studies. It is argued that, in many priming tasks, large amounts of task-relevant information are available from various sources, and that, therefore, the information available from a specific study episode will have only a small impact on overall performance level. Under such circumstances, high levels of baseline performance and small priming effects will be observed. The experiments reported here investigated the hypothesis that a high baseline performance in information-processing tasks that are used to measure priming may constrain priming effects. In a series of word-naming experiments, perceptual difficulty and, therefore, baseline performance was manipulated. Under easy conditions, priming effects were relatively small and were not affected by word frequency, spaced repetition, or delay. Under more difficult conditions, priming effects were larger, and significant effects of all of the above-mentioned experimental manipulations were observed. Under conditions that produced the largest priming effects, a significant relationship between priming and explicit-memory performance could be observed. In the last experiment, it was shown that the characteristics of the retrieval task can substantially affect the magnitude of priming. It is argued that priming effects should be considered to reflect interactions between memory traces and the information-processing components of the priming task.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519696     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  39 in total

1.  Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word-fragment completion.

Authors:  H L Roediger; B H Challis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A method for judging measures of stochastic dependence: further comments on the current controversy.

Authors:  A L Ostergaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Episodic effects on picture identification: implications for theories of concept learning and theories of memory.

Authors:  L L Jacoby; J G Baker; L R Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon; M Verwoerd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Transfer of processing in repetition priming: some inappropriate findings.

Authors:  A S Brown; D R Neblett; T C Jones; D B Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Human learning and memory: connections and dissociations.

Authors:  D L Hintzman
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Modality differences in recognition memory for words and their attributes.

Authors:  K Kirsner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-04

8.  Dissociation of memory and awareness in young and older adults.

Authors:  L L Light; A Singh; J L Capps
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  Dissociative effect of massed repetition on implicit and explicit measures of memory.

Authors:  B H Challis; R Sidhu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Intention and awareness in perceptual identification priming.

Authors:  A Richardson-Klavehn; M G Lee; R Joubran; R A Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-05
View more
  14 in total

1.  The modality-specific and -nonspecific components of long-term priming are frequency sensitive.

Authors:  J S Bowers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

2.  Search and selection processes in implicit and explicit word-stem completion performance in young, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  L Ryan; A Ostergaard; L Norton; J Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-07

3.  Target similarity effects: support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions.

Authors:  M S Humphreys; G Tehan; A O'Shea; S W Bolland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

4.  Two predictions of a compound cue model of priming.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-09

Review 5.  Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Heekyeong Park; Paul D Kieffaber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing.

Authors:  Carrie R McDonald; Thomas Thesen; Chad Carlson; Mark Blumberg; Holly M Girard; Amy Trongnetrpunya; Jason S Sherfey; Orrin Devinsky; Rubin Kuzniecky; Werner K Dolye; Sydney S Cash; Matthew K Leonard; Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Repetition Priming and Repetition Suppression: A Case for Enhanced Efficiency Through Neural Synchronization.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; Carson C Chow; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.065

8.  A single-system model predicts recognition memory and repetition priming in amnesia.

Authors:  Christopher J Berry; Roy P C Kessels; Arie J Wester; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Aging and repetition priming for targets and distracters in a working memory task.

Authors:  Daniel M Caggiano; Yang Jiang; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2006 Sep-Dec

10.  Priming Effects on Subsequent Episodic Memory: Testing Attentional Accounts.

Authors:  Alexander J Kaula; Richard N Henson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.