Literature DB >> 9519233

A comparison of the performance of two modern multidose dry powder asthma inhalers.

L S Hill1, A L Slater.   

Abstract

Little is known about the shot potency and dose consistency of many of the inhalers in common use, and until recently there has been little consensus over the best way to evaluate these parameters. Since marked effects can be achieved with the inhaled route, more information is needed about the dosing characteristics of all available inhalers. As there are now two multidose powder inhalers available in the U.K. capable of supplying 1 month or more of treatment, this study was designed to compare the delivery characteristics of these two dry powder inhalers delivering glucocorticosteroids. The method used was in vitro analysis of the emitted dose and fine particle fraction throughout the life of five of each type of device. The multidose powder inhaler delivered between 87 and 93% of the label claim dosage, whilst the reservoir device delivered 40-58%. There was no fall off of shot potency towards the end of either device's life. Fine particle fraction for the multidose and reservoir systems, was 21 and 18%, respectively, at 60 l min-1 flow, but fell to 16 and 6% at 28.3 l min-1. In conclusion, there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.0001) in the drug emission of both dose and fine particle fraction of these two powder inhalers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519233     DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90040-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  10 in total

Review 1.  Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Implications for Dry Powder Inhalers.

Authors:  Sohini Ghosh; Jill A Ohar; M Bradley Drummond
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 2.  The use of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma.

Authors:  H William Kelly; Hengameh Heidarian-Raissy
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Using Filters to Estimate Regional Lung Deposition with Dry Powder Inhalers.

Authors:  Scott Tavernini; Dino J Farina; Andrew R Martin; Warren H Finlay
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  How to match the optimal currently available inhaler device to an individual child with asthma or recurrent wheeze.

Authors:  Wim M van Aalderen; Luis Garcia-Marcos; Monika Gappa; Warren Lenney; Søren Pedersen; Richard Dekhuijzen; David Price
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.871

5.  Effect of Flow Rate on In Vitro Aerodynamic Performance of NEXThaler(®) in Comparison with Diskus(®) and Turbohaler(®) Dry Powder Inhalers.

Authors:  Francesca Buttini; Gaetano Brambilla; Diego Copelli; Viviana Sisti; Anna Giulia Balducci; Ruggero Bettini; Irene Pasquali
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.849

6.  H5N1 influenza pandemic: contingency plans.

Authors:  Kenneth W T Tsang; Philip Eng; C K Liam; Young-soo Shim; Wah K Lam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 13-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prevalence and Associated Factors of Suboptimal Daily Peak Inspiratory Flow and Technique Misuse of Dry Powder Inhalers in Outpatients with Stable Chronic Airway Diseases.

Authors:  Nan Ding; Wei Zhang; Zhuo Wang; Chong Bai; Qian He; Yuchao Dong; Xiumin Feng; Jingxi Zhang; Shen Gao
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2021-06-23

Review 8.  The Diskus: a review of its position among dry powder inhaler devices.

Authors:  H Chrystyn
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  COPD: adherence to therapy.

Authors:  Alessandro Sanduzzi; Piero Balbo; Piero Candoli; Giousuè A Catapano; Paola Contini; Alessio Mattei; Giovanni Puglisi; Luigi Santoiemma; Anna A Stanziola
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2014-11-22

Review 10.  COPD: the patient perspective.

Authors:  Paul W Jones; Henrik Watz; Emiel F M Wouters; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2016-02-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.