Literature DB >> 9518983

Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival?

J S Goodwin1, J L Freeman, D Freeman, A B Nattinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mortality rates from breast cancer are approximately 25% higher for women in the northeastern United States than for women in the South or West. This study examined the hypothesis that the elevation is due to decreased survival rather than increased incidence.
METHODS: Data on breast cancer incidence, treatment, and mortality were reviewed.
RESULTS: The elevated mortality in the Northeast is apparent only in older women. For women aged 65 years and older, breast cancer mortality is 26% higher in New England than in the South, while incidence is only 3% higher. Breast cancer mortality for older women by state correlates poorly with incidence (r = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: Those seeking to explain the excess breast cancer mortality in the Northeast should assess survival and should examine differences in cancer control practices that affect survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Breast Cancer; Cancer; Causes Of Death; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Geographic Factors; Mortality; Neoplasms; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9518983      PMCID: PMC1508360          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  31 in total

1.  Geographic variation in breast cancer mortality in the United States: a hypothesis involving exposure to solar radiation.

Authors:  F C Garland; C F Garland; E D Gorham; J F Young
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Geographic variation in mortality from breast cancer among white women in the United States.

Authors:  S R Sturgeon; C Schairer; M Gail; M McAdams; L A Brinton; R N Hoover
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Determination of lung cancer incidence in the elderly using Medicare claims data.

Authors:  A M McBean; J D Babish; J L Warren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Geographical variation in cancer patient survival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment?

Authors:  S Karjalainen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes.

Authors:  A Lee-Feldstein; H Anton-Culver; P J Feldstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Age as a predictor of diagnostic and initial treatment intensity in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R A Silliman; E Guadagnoli; A B Weitberg; V Mor
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-03

7.  Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Satariano; G M Swanson; P P Moll
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Determinants of survival in older cancer patients.

Authors:  J S Goodwin; J M Samet; W C Hunt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-08-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Choice of cancer therapy varies with age of patient.

Authors:  J Samet; W C Hunt; C Key; C G Humble; J S Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  S Greenfield; D M Blanco; R M Elashoff; P A Ganz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Intra-urban differences in breast cancer mortality: a study from the city of Malmö in Sweden.

Authors:  J Manjer; G Berglund; L Bondesson; J P Garne; L Janzon; A Lindgren; J Malina; S Matson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Mortality from breast carcinoma among US women: the role and implications of socio-economics, heterogeneous insurance, screening mammography, and geography.

Authors:  Albert A Okunade; Mustafa C Karakus
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2003-11

3.  Increase in mortality rate of liver transplant candidates residing in specific geographic areas: analysis of UNOS data.

Authors:  D Zorzi; C Rastellini; D H Freeman; G Elias; A Duchini; L Cicalese
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Influence of primary care physician availability and socioeconomic deprivation on breast cancer from 1988 to 2008: a spatio-temporal analysis.

Authors:  Lung-Chang Chien; Anjali D Deshpande; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Geographic variation in health insurance benefits in Qianjiang District, China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Liang Zhang; Xuejiao Liu; Ting Ye; Yongfei Wang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-02-05

6.  Geographic disparities in colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Xiaoling Niu; Francis P Boscoe
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  The geographic distribution of breast cancer incidence in Massachusetts 1988 to 1997, adjusted for covariates.

Authors:  T Joseph Sheehan; Laurie M DeChello; Martin Kulldorff; David I Gregorio; Susan Gershman; Mary Mroszczyk
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2004-08-03       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer: twenty-year data from two SEER registries.

Authors:  Patricia Tai; Edward Yu; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Gábor Cserni; Georges Vlastos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.