Literature DB >> 8151873

Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes.

A Lee-Feldstein1, H Anton-Culver, P J Feldstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in and relative importance of treatment modalities by hospital type and their effect on survival of breast cancer patients.
DESIGN: Cohort of population-based cancer registry breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1984 through 1990. The analysis was done within this cohort, stratified by hospital type and treatment modality.
SETTING: Orange County, California, residents diagnosed and treated for breast cancer in 126 hospitals (small community, large community, health maintenance organization [HMO], or teaching). PATIENTS: A total of 5892 non-Hispanic white women with no known prior cancer and with localized or regional, histologically confirmed breast cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effects of treatment modality and hospital type on survival. Adjustments for differences in age, tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, and histology were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: Use of recommended breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was greatest among teaching hospitals, where more than 50% of patients with localized disease received BCS between 1988 and 1990 and 40% to 50% with regional disease received BCS between 1984 and 1990. At nonteaching hospitals, 30% or less of patients received BCS between 1984 and 1989, regardless of stage. Rates of survival after BCS were at least as good as rates of survival after total mastectomy, other factors being equal. Survival rates varied by hospital type for patients with localized disease, with significantly better rates at large community hospitals and significantly worse rates at HMO hospitals in comparison with small hospitals. Patients with regional disease at large hospitals had a significant survival advantage.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of BCS is strongly urged. Overall, large community hospitals had significantly better survival rates than small community and HMO hospitals. Further follow-up will determine if treatment and survival differences by hospital type persist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8151873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

1.  Managed care plan performance since 1980: another look at 2 literature reviews.

Authors:  K Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Hospital volume and survival of breast cancer patients in Connecticut.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

4.  Does Center Volume Correlate with Survival from Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Anton Scharl; Uwe-Jochen Göhring
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Breast cancer outcomes among older women: HMO, fee-for-service, and delivery system comparisons.

Authors:  A Lee-Feldstein; P J Feldstein; T Buchmueller; G Katterhagen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The quality of early-stage breast cancer care.

Authors:  N A Bickell; A H Aufses; M R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prostate cancer treatment and ten-year survival among group/staff HMO and fee-for-service Medicare patients.

Authors:  A L Potosky; R M Merrill; G F Riley; S H Taplin; W Barlow; B H Fireman; J D Lubitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Variations in breast cancer treatment by patient and provider characteristics.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; E Guadagnoli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  A breast cancer care report card. An assessment of performance and a pursuit of value.

Authors:  J G West; M L Sutherland; J S Link; D A Margileth
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-04

10.  Adjuvant hormonal therapy use among insured, low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen Kimmick; Roger Anderson; Fabian Camacho; Monali Bhosle; Wenke Hwang; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.