Literature DB >> 22845911

Increase in mortality rate of liver transplant candidates residing in specific geographic areas: analysis of UNOS data.

D Zorzi1, C Rastellini, D H Freeman, G Elias, A Duchini, L Cicalese.   

Abstract

We sought to evaluate survival of liver transplant candidates living in geographic areas with limited access to specialized transplant centers (TxC). We analyzed survival outcome among candidates listed for liver transplant in United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) Region 4 from 2004 to 2010. Candidates were stratified into three groups according to the distance from the patient's residence to the closest hospital with a liver transplant program: Group 1 (Gr 1) <30 miles (m), Group 2 (Gr 2) 30-60 m and Group 3 (Gr 3) >60 m. Of the 5673 patients included in the study, 49% resided >30 m from a TxC. Eight percent of the cohort experienced death or dropped out of the list due to medical condition deterioration, with worse outcomes for Gr 2 and Gr 3 (8.5% and 9.9%, respectively, vs. 6.5% for Gr 1 [p < 0.001]). Among patients with a MELD score <20, mortality was higher in Gr 2 and Gr 3 compared to Gr 1 (p < 0.001). We conclude that for Region 4, the mortality risk in patients living >30 m from a TxC is higher. We suggest that the variable "distance from a TxC" should be used to improve the estimate of the mortality risk for patients on the waiting list. © Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22845911      PMCID: PMC3410658          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04083.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  16 in total

1.  Clinical epidemiological analysis of the mortality rate of liver transplant candidates living in rural areas.

Authors:  Michele Molinari; Paul D Renfrew; Neil M Petrie; Sarah De Coutere; Mohamed Abdolell
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.782

2.  Risk factors for liver transplantation waiting list mortality.

Authors:  Michael A Fink; S Roger Berry; Paul J Gow; Peter W Angus; Bao-Zhong Wang; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; Christopher Christophi; Robert M Jones
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.029

3.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Authors:  M Malinchoc; P S Kamath; F D Gordon; C J Peine; J Rank; P C ter Borg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Is MELD score sufficient to predict not only death on waiting list, but also post-transplant survival?

Authors:  Gerd R Silberhumer; Hubert Hetz; Susanne Rasoul-Rockenschaub; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Thomas Soliman; Rudolf Steininger; Ferdinand Muehlbacher; Gabriela A Berlakovich
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival?

Authors:  J S Goodwin; J L Freeman; D Freeman; A B Nattinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A statewide, population-based, time series analysis of access to liver transplantation.

Authors:  J E Tuttle-Newhall; R Rutledge; M Johnson; J Fair
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Ability to pay and geographical proximity influence access to liver transplantation even in a system with universal access.

Authors:  P Aiden McCormick; Marie O'rourke; Deirdre Carey; Marie Laffoy
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Geographic variations in breast cancer survival among older women: implications for quality of breast cancer care.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Jean L Freeman; Jonathan D Mahnken; Daniel H Freeman; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Referral of lung cancer patients to university hospital cancer centers. A population-based study in two rural states.

Authors:  E R Greenberg; B Dain; D Freeman; J Yates; R Korson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.

Authors:  Russell Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Richard Freeman; Ann Harper; Ray Kim; Patrick Kamath; Walter Kremers; John Lake; Todd Howard; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Ruud Krom
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  10 in total

1.  Same policy, different impact: Center-level effects of share 35 liver allocation.

Authors:  Douglas R Murken; Allison W Peng; David D Aufhauser; Peter L Abt; David S Goldberg; Matthew H Levine
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Impact of geography on organ allocation: Beyond the distance to the transplantation center.

Authors:  Rony Ghaoui; Jane Garb; Fredric Gordon; Elizabeth Pomfret
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-07-08

3.  Liver transplants among US veterans--reply.

Authors:  David E Kaplan; David S Goldberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Jul 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Liver transplant center variability in accepting organ offers and its impact on patient survival.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Benjamin French; James D Lewis; Frank I Scott; Ronac Mamtani; Richard Gilroy; Scott D Halpern; Peter L Abt
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Association of distance from a transplant center with access to waitlist placement, receipt of liver transplantation, and survival among US veterans.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Benjamin French; Kimberly A Forde; Peter W Groeneveld; Therese Bittermann; Lisa Backus; Scott D Halpern; David E Kaplan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte Kelly; Claire Hulme; Tracey Farragher; Graham Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Access to Liver Transplantation and Patient Survival among Asian Populations: Pre-Share 35 vs Post-Share 35.

Authors:  Y Zhang
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2017-11-01

8.  The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Liver Disease in the United States: An Analysis from UNOS Database.

Authors:  Yefei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-03-24

9.  Proximity to transplant center and outcome among liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Gwilym J Webb; James Hodson; Abhishek Chauhan; John O'Grady; James M Neuberger; Gideon M Hirschfield; James W Ferguson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Geographic Variation in Cold Ischemia Time: Kidney vs. Liver Transplantation in the United States, 2003-2011.

Authors:  Naoru Koizumi; Debasree DasGupta; Amit V Patel; Tony E Smith; Jeremy D Mayer; Clive Callender; Joseph K Melancon
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2015-08-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.