Literature DB >> 11117585

Early initiation of post-PEG feeding: do published recommendations affect clinical practice?

R Srinivasan1, R S Fisher.   

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1980, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become the procedure of choice for long-term enteral feeding in patients who are unable to take adequate oral nutrition. Traditionally, gastroenterologists have waited for 24 hr after PEG tube placement before initiating feedings. However, recently published data have described the safety and efficacy of initiating PEG tube feedings as early as 3 hr after PEG tube placement. The objectives of this study were to determine how many hours after PEG tube placement practicing gastroenterologists initiate feedings and to determine whether they were aware of the pertinent literature. A four-page questionnaire was mailed to 35 practicing gastroenterologists, and the data gathered were analyzed using the SAS statistical package. A majority (81.5%) were aware of articles published in the last six years regarding the safety and efficacy of early initiation of feeding after PEG; of interest, however, only 10.7% were initiating feedings less than 3 hr after PEG tube placement. In conclusion, there exists a discrepancy between published recommendations and clinical practice regarding early initiation of feedings after PEG tube placement in this group of gastroenterologists who were surveyed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117585     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005552227119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  6 in total

1.  Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  G V Stiegmann; J S Goff; D Silas; N Pearlman; J Sun; L Norton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Safety of early feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  D N Brown; B W Miedema; P D King; J B Marshall
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  Randomized prospective trial of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

Authors:  T L McCarter; S C Condon; R C Aguilar; D J Gibson; Y K Chen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized prospective comparison of early and delayed feeding.

Authors:  U Choudhry; C J Barde; R Markert; N Gopalswamy
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Early feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is safe in children.

Authors:  S Werlin; M Glicklich; R Cohen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Practice guidelines and measurement: state-of-the-science.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  A comparative observational study of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Manoj A Vyawahare; Mrunal Shirodkar; Amit Gharat; Prachi Patil; Shaesta Mehta; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-17

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  Jye Hae Park; Seonkyeong Rhie; Su Jin Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2011-01-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.