Literature DB >> 9514266

How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials?

L Zhang1, J Skolnick.   

Abstract

Knowledge-based potentials are used widely in protein folding and inverse folding algorithms. Two kinds of derivation methods are used. (1) The interactions in a database of known protein structures are assumed to obey a Boltzmann distribution. (2) The stability of the native folds relative to a manifold of misfolded structures is optimized. Here, a set of previously derived contact and secondary structure propensity potentials, taken as the "true" potentials, are employed to construct an artificial protein structural database from protein fragments. Then, new sets of potentials are derived to see how they are related to the true potentials. Using the Boltzmann distribution method, when the stability of the structures in the database lies within a certain range, both contact potentials and secondary structure propensities can be derived separately with remarkable accuracy. In general, the optimization method was found to be less accurate due to errors in the "excess energy" contribution. When the excess energy terms are kept as a constraint, the true potentials are recovered exactly.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514266      PMCID: PMC2143818          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560070112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  16 in total

1.  Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins.

Authors:  V N Maiorov; G M Crippen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: studies with crambin.

Authors:  C Wilson; S Doniach
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1989

Review 3.  Knowledge-based potentials for proteins.

Authors:  M J Sippl
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Search for the most stable folds of protein chains: I. Application of a self-consistent molecular field theory to a problem of protein three-dimensional structure prediction.

Authors:  A V Finkelstein; B A Reva
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1996-05

5.  Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps.

Authors:  L Mirny; E Domany
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-12

6.  Prediction of protein conformation.

Authors:  P Y Chou; G D Fasman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1974-01-15       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme.

Authors:  A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-04

8.  Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics?

Authors:  A V Finkelstein; A M Gutin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-10

9.  Step-wise mutation of barnase to binase. A procedure for engineering increased stability of proteins and an experimental analysis of the evolution of protein stability.

Authors:  L Serrano; A G Day; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches.

Authors:  J P Kocher; M J Rooman; S J Wodak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  13 in total

1.  De novo simulations of the folding thermodynamics of the GCN4 leucine zipper.

Authors:  D Mohanty; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Scoring functions in protein folding and design.

Authors:  R I Dima; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Database-derived potentials dependent on protein size for in silico folding and design.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Dimitri Gilis; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes.

Authors:  M R Betancourt; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Recovering physical potentials from a model protein databank.

Authors:  J W Mullinax; W G Noid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The emergence of scaling in sequence-based physical models of protein evolution.

Authors:  Eric J Deeds; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Y Dehouck; D Gilis; M Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Empirical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intra-molecular and inter-molecular inter-residue interactions.

Authors:  O Keskin; I Bahar; A Y Badretdinov; O B Ptitsyn; R L Jernigan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  What should the Z-score of native protein structures be?

Authors:  L Zhang; J Skolnick
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.