Literature DB >> 9513987

Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications.

D M Rosen1, A M Lam, M Chapman, M Carlton, G M Cario.   

Abstract

The existence of numerous techniques for the creation of pneumoperitoneum at laparoscopy indicates that none have been proven totally efficacious or complication free. These methods include the standard technique of insufflation after insertion of the Veress needle via the umbilicus or less commonly via the transfundal or transforniceal routes, open laparoscopy involving dissection through the linea alba and opening of the peritoneum under direct vision, and direct trocar insertion as well as variations on these techniques. After reviewing the methods available and surveying the existing data concerning the rates of failure and complications, we conclude that no single technique can claim to be overwhelmingly superior, and that laparoscopists should, therefore, acquaint themselves with at least two of these techniques. Finally, we recommend a large-scale combined survey by the colleges of obstetricians and gynecologists and surgeons on rates of failure and complications of the varied approaches of abdominal entry for laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9513987     DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199803000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  11 in total

1.  Direct visual or blind insertion of the primary trocar.

Authors:  S Jirecek; M Dräger; H Leitich; F Nagele; R Wenzl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh.

Authors:  C Aubé; P Pessaux; J J Tuech; R du Plessis; P Becker; C Caron; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Safe and rapid laparoscopic access--a new approach.

Authors:  Jared L Antevil; Sunil Bhoyrul; Mathew E Brunson; Mark A Vierra; Nayan D Swadia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Large bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Kahraman Ulker; Turgut Anuk; Murat Bozkurt; Yetkin Karasu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Three simple steps during closed laparoscopic entry may minimize major injuries.

Authors:  George A Vilos; Angelos G Vilos; Basim Abu-Rafea; Jackie Hollett-Caines; Zohreh Nikkhah-Abyaneh; Fawaz Edris
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Creation of pneumoperitoneum: noninvasive monitoring of clinical effects of elevated intraperitoneal pressure for the insertion of the first trocar.

Authors:  Octávio Henrique Mendes Hypólito; João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo; Fabiana Mara Scarpelli de Lima Alvarenga Caldeira; Otávio Cansanção de Azevedo; Susana Abe Miyahira; Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel; Otávio Monteiro Becker; Afonso Cesar Cabral Guedes Machado; Gilberto Pinheiro Nunes Filho; Glícia Cansanção Azevedo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Open port placement of the first laparoscopic port: a safe technique.

Authors:  Pawan Lal; Lakhvinder Singh; P N Agarwal; Ravi Kant
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  A 5-mm open-entry technique achieves safe, single-step, cosmetic laparoscopic entry.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; Jennifer Lang; Inna Berin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  The use of blunt-tipped 12-mm trocars without fascial closure in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tibério M Siqueira; Ryan F Paterson; Ramsay L Kuo; Larry H Stevens; James E Lingeman; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.