Literature DB >> 23902577

Debating deposits: an interobserver variability study of lymph nodes and pericolonic tumor deposits in colonic adenocarcinoma.

Jonathan B Rock1, M Kay Washington, N Volkan Adsay, Joel K Greenson, Elizabeth A Montgomery, Marie E Robert, Rhonda K Yantiss, Amy M Lehman, Wendy L Frankel.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The American Joint Committee on Cancer's Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition defines pericolonic tumor deposits (TDs) as discrete tumor foci in pericolic fat showing no evidence of residual lymph node (LN). This definition relies on subjective features rather than size (5th edition) or shape (6th edition) and introduced the category N1c. Although typically straightforward, metastases are encountered for which the distinction between LNs and TDs is unclear. For data to be meaningful, agreement on distinguishing features between positive LNs and TDs is needed.
OBJECTIVES: To assess agreement among gastrointestinal pathologists evaluating difficult metastases and to report the distinguishing features they found helpful.
DESIGN: Twenty-five tumor metastases from right-sided colonic adenocarcinomas were selected in which the distinction between positive LNs and TDs was challenging. Virtual slides were reviewed by 7 gastrointestinal pathologists. A list of features potentially helpful in differentiating positive LNs and TDs was ranked for usefulness by each pathologist. Every metastasis was diagnosed as positive LN or TD. For each case diagnosed as positive LN, reviewers were asked to list every feature used in diagnosis.
RESULTS: Complete agreement was found for 11 of 25 metastases, 5 positive LNs and 6 TDs (κ statistic, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.67). Top-ranked features included round shape, peripheral lymphocyte rim, peripheral lymphoid follicles, possible subcapsular sinus, residual LN in surrounding fibroadipose tissue, and thick capsule. The top used features were similar among reviewers.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant agreement on positive LNs and TDs in difficult colonic adenocarcinoma metastases was found among evaluators, but inconsistency remains. Round shape, peripheral lymphocyte rim, peripheral lymphoid follicles, possible subcapsular sinus, residual LN in surrounding fibroadipose tissue, and thick capsule were most often used to aid in diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23902577      PMCID: PMC3935980          DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0166-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  28 in total

1.  Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou; Allan Donner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection.

Authors:  Natalie E Joseph; Elin R Sigurdson; Alexandra L Hanlon; Hao Wang; Robert J Mayer; John S MacDonald; Paul J Catalano; Daniel G Haller
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Prognostic significance of extranodal microscopic foci discontinuous with primary lesion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Ueno; H Mochizuki; S Tamakuma
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Metastases in small lymph nodes from colon cancer.

Authors:  L Herrera-Ornelas; J Justiniano; N Castillo; N J Petrelli; J P Stulc; A Mittelman
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-11

6.  Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089.

Authors:  T E Le Voyer; E R Sigurdson; A L Hanlon; R J Mayer; J S Macdonald; P J Catalano; D G Haller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Impact of microscopic extranodal tumor deposits on the outcome of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashish Prabhudesai; S Arif; Caroline J Finlayson; Devinder Kumar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Impact of the Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction on staging of right-sided colon cancer: results of multivariate analysis.

Authors:  J C Harrison; P J Dean; F el-Zeky; R Vander Zwaag
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Venous permeation of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  K K Lui; M Enjoji; K Inokuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1980-12

10.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer is associated with local lymphocyte infiltration and low frequency of distant metastases.

Authors:  A Buckowitz; H-P Knaebel; A Benner; H Bläker; J Gebert; P Kienle; M von Knebel Doeberitz; M Kloor
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  14 in total

1.  Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

Authors:  M Widmar; M Keskin; P Strombom; P Beltran; O S Chow; J J Smith; G M Nash; J Shia; D Russell; J Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of endometrial carcinoma in morbidly obese patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Özgür Bige; Ahmet Demir; Bahadır Saatli; Meral Koyuncuoğlu; Uğur Saygılı
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 3.  Assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark L H Ong; John B Schofield
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

4.  The impact of tumor deposits on colonic adenocarcinoma AJCC TNM staging and outcome.

Authors:  Ming Jin; Rachel Roth; Jonathan B Rock; Mary Kay Washington; Amy Lehman; Wendy L Frankel
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Prognostic Importance of Tumor Deposits in the Ipsilateral Axillary Region of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Merih Guray Durak; Tulay Canda; Betul Yilmaz; Nazli Sena Seker; Seda Eryigit Kokkoz; Zumre Arican Alicikus; Nesrin Akturk; Ilknur Bilkay Gorken; Hulya Ellidokuz; Ali Ibrahim Sevinc; Serdar Saydam; Sulen Sarioglu
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 6.  Lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: old controversies and recent advances.

Authors:  Annika Resch; Cord Langner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Development and validation of a novel prognostic nomogram including tumor deposits could better predict survival for colorectal cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Rui Bai; Yinuo Tan; Dan Li; Mengyuan Yang; Linzhen Yu; Ying Yuan; Xuefeng Fang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 8.  Newly recognized extratumoral features of colorectal cancer challenge the current tumor-node-metastasis staging system.

Authors:  Elias Athanasakis; Sofia Xenaki; Maria Venianaki; George Chalkiadakis; Emmanuel Chrysos
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-19

9.  Prognostic significance of classified extramural tumor deposits and extracapsular lymph node invasion in T3-4 colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Tomoki Yamano; Shuho Semba; Masafumi Noda; Mie Yoshimura; Masayoshi Kobayashi; Michiko Hamanaka; Naohito Beppu; Aya Yano; Kiyoshi Tsukamoto; Nagahide Matsubara; Naohiro Tomita
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  A nomogram improves AJCC stages for colorectal cancers by introducing CEA, modified lymph node ratio and negative lymph node count.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Wei Gao; Qi-Feng Luo; Xiao-Wei Yin; Shiva Basnet; Zhen-Ling Dai; Hai-Yan Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.