Literature DB >> 9509149

The use of image blur as a depth cue.

G Mather1.   

Abstract

Images of three-dimensional scenes inevitably contain regions that are spatially blurred by differing amounts, owing to depth-of-focus limitations in the imaging apparatus. Recent perceptual data indicate that this blur variation acts as an effective cue to depth: if one image region contains sharply focused texture, and another contains blurred texture, then the two regions may be perceived at different depths, even in the absence of other depth cues. Calculations based on the optical properties of the human eye have shown that variation in blur as a function of depth follows the same course as variation in binocular disparity with depth. Computational modelling has shown that the effect of blur on single-step edges is very similar to its effect on random fractal patterns, because the two stimuli have similar Fourier amplitude spectra. Blur discrimination thresholds for the two stimuli were also very similar, and could be predicted by a model based on high-spatial-frequency discrimination. A comparison of blur discrimination thresholds with the range of binocular stereopsis indicates that blur and disparity cues cover different distance ranges: stereopsis is most effective for distances relatively close to fixation, while blur information should be more effective for larger distances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9509149     DOI: 10.1068/p261147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  15 in total

1.  Neuronal population codes and the perception of object distance in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  J E Lewis; L Maler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Object localization through the lateral line system of fish: theory and experiment.

Authors:  Julie Goulet; Jacob Engelmann; Boris P Chagnaud; Jan-Moritz P Franosch; Maria D Suttner; J Leo van Hemmen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  How aquatic water-beetle larvae with small chambered eyes overcome challenges of hunting under water.

Authors:  Annette Stowasser; Elke K Buschbeck
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Emily A Cooper; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Judging surface slant for placing objects: a role for motion parallax.

Authors:  Stefan Louw; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Perceived blur in naturally contoured images depends on phase.

Authors:  Stephanie Murray; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-02

9.  The Nature and Timing of Tele-Pseudoscopic Experiences.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Harold Hill; Robert S Allison
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-01-20

10.  Defocus Discrimination in Video: Motion in Depth.

Authors:  Vincent A Petrella; Simon Labute; Michael S Langer; Paul G Kry
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.