Literature DB >> 9508534

Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease: an economic analysis.

Z M Younossi1, J C Teran, T G Ganiats, W D Carey.   

Abstract

The use of ultrasound (US) to assist in liver biopsy for nonfocal liver disease has been shown to significantly decrease the incidence of minor complications (defined as pain requiring treatment, hypotension, or bleeding). In this study, decision analysis was used to estimate the average additional net charge for US guidance. The risks for minor and major complications were extracted from the literature. The incidence of minor complications such as pain and bleeding not requiring hospitalization has been reported as 49% for blind liver biopsy and 39% for US-guided liver biopsy. Major complications requiring hospital admission occur in 4% of blind liver biopsies and 2% of US-guided liver biopsies. A decision tree was used to calculate the total charges of liver biopsy and its associated complications. The charge for treating an episode of minor complications was estimated at $605. The charge related to an episode of major complications was estimated at $1533. The total charge for an ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (except the added charge for the use of ultrasound) was $1770, or $102 less than the same charge for blind liver biopsy. The addition of ultrasound in performing liver biopsies for diffuse parenchymal liver disease is cost-saving if the additional charge of US is less than $102.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9508534     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018815802500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  7 in total

1.  A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided anterior subcostal liver biopsy versus the conventional Menghini technique.

Authors:  E Papini; C M Pacella; Z Rossi; G Bizzarri; R Fabbrini; F Nardi; R Picardi
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  D B McGill; J Rakela; A R Zinsmeister; B J Ott
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  K D Lindor; C Bru; R A Jorgensen; J Rakela; J M Bordas; J B Gross; J Rodes; D B McGill; C C Reading; E M James; J W Charboneau; J Ludwig; K P Batts; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Percutaneous liver biopsy in difficult cases simplified by CT or ultrasonic localization.

Authors:  J T Bjork; W D Foley; R R Varma
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London.

Authors:  I T Gilmore; A Burroughs; I M Murray-Lyon; R Williams; D Jenkins; A Hopkins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Statement on outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  W H Jacobs; S B Goldberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy.

Authors:  C H Janes; K D Lindor
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

  7 in total
  35 in total

1.  Percutaneous liver biopsy: what is the current approach? Results of a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  W Mayoral; J H Lewis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  A Grant; J Neuberger
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Liver biopsy: when, how, by whom, and where?

Authors:  D B McGill
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-02

4.  Outpatient liver biopsy: a prospective evaluation of 500 cases.

Authors:  P Beddy; I L Lyburn; T Geoghegan; O Buckley; A R Buckley; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Percutaneous liver biopsy practice patterns among Canadian hepatologists.

Authors:  Mohammed Aljawad; Eric M Yoshida; Julia Uhanova; Paul Marotta; Natasha Chandok
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Liver biopsy in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Thuong G Van Ha
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Percutaneous Liver Biopsy.

Authors:  Maya Gambarin-Gelwan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2006-09

8.  Why most hepatologists do not perform percutaneous liver biopsy. Re: Aljawad M, Yoshida EM, Uhanova J, Marotta P, Chandok N. Percutaneous liver biopsy practice patterns among Canadian hepatologists. Can J Gastroenterol 2013;27:e31-34.

Authors:  Enver Zerem
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-02

9.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnostic strategies for differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Kyung Won Kim; Seong Ho Park; Sangjin Shin; Jeonghoon Ahn; Junhee Pyo; Atul B Shinagare; Katherine M Krajewski; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Influence of operator experience on performance of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  Patrick Chevallier; Frederic Ruitort; Alban Denys; Pascal Staccini; Marie Christine Saint-Paul; Denis Ouzan; Jean Paul Motamedi; Albert Tran; Pierre Schnyder; Jean Noël Bruneton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.