Literature DB >> 7698705

Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London.

I T Gilmore1, A Burroughs, I M Murray-Lyon, R Williams, D Jenkins, A Hopkins.   

Abstract

The liver section of the British Society of Gastroenterology and the research unit of the Royal College of Physicians collaborated to set up a nationwide audit to investigate the practice of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales. Each of 189 health districts in England and Wales was approached to provide a list of 10 consecutive percutaneous biopsies performed during 1991, and details of demographic data, indications, suspected diagnosis, investigations, biopsy technique, outcome, and influence on patient management were collected. Data were retrieved on 1500 (79%). The age distribution showed 6% of biopsies were done in those over 80 years of age and as many over 90 as under 10 years of age. Suspected malignancy and chronic liver disease each contributed one third of the indications. In 34% the procedure was carried out by radiologists under ultrasound image control. The remainder were done by general physicians and gastroenterologists, with the operator in the second group being more senior and experienced. The Trucut biopsy needle accounted for two thirds of biopsies, the remainder being the Menghini type. For both needles the samples were recorded as excellent or satisfactory in 83% and inadequate in only 5%. Bleeding complicated 26 procedures (1.7%), requiring transfusion in 11, and was commoner when clotting was impaired or serum bilirubin raised. There were two definite and three possible procedure related, given an overall mortality of 0.13-0.33%. The diagnosis made before biopsy was confirmed in 63% of patients, and the clinician found the biopsy helpful in treatment in 75%. Day case biopsy and techniques to reduce the risk of bleeding were surprisingly rare in this series, which has given a unique opportunity to examine everyday practice across a wide range of hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7698705      PMCID: PMC1382461          DOI: 10.1136/gut.36.3.437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  27 in total

1.  Needle biopsy of the liver: a review.

Authors:  S SHERLOCK
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Transjugular approach to liver biopsy and transhepatic cholangiography.

Authors:  J Rösch; P C Lakin; R Antonovic; C T Dotter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-08-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Biopsy findings in cases of rejection of liver allograft.

Authors:  S G Hubscher; D Clements; E Elias; P McMaster
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Percutaneous liver biopsy with plugging of needle track: a safe method for use in patients with impaired coagulation.

Authors:  S A Riley; W R Ellis; H C Irving; D J Lintott; A T Axon; M S Losowsky
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-08-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Experience with transjugular liver biopsy.

Authors:  H J Bull; I T Gilmore; R D Bradley; J H Marigold; R P Thompson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Comparison of the Trucut and Surecut liver biopsy needles.

Authors:  E R Littlewood; I T Gilmore; I M Murray-Lyon; K R Stephens; F J Paradinas
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Liver biopsy: techniques, clinical applications, and complications.

Authors:  J E Hegarty; R Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-04-28

8.  Liver biopsy as a day-case procedure: selection and complications in 200 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D Westaby; B R MacDougall; R Williams
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-15

9.  [Limitations and hazards of percutaneous liver biopsy with the Menghini needle. Experiences with 80,000 liver biopsies].

Authors:  H Lindner
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1967-09-29       Impact factor: 0.628

10.  Tru-cut and Menghini needles: different yield in the histological diagnosis of liver disease.

Authors:  L Vargas-Tank; V Martínez; M I Jirón; J R Soto; R Armas-Merino
Journal:  Liver       Date:  1985-06
View more
  78 in total

1.  Percutaneous liver biopsy: what is the current approach? Results of a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  W Mayoral; J H Lewis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  A Grant; J Neuberger
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Liver biopsy: when, how, by whom, and where?

Authors:  D B McGill
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-02

4.  To perform or not to perform liver biopsy: an alternative view.

Authors:  D Joy; B B Scott
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Hepatobiliary quiz-5 (2013).

Authors:  Swastik Agrawal; Radha K Dhiman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2013-03

6.  Acute pancreatitis secondary to hemobilia after percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  Luis R Peña; Todd L Horn; Christopher B Cross
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  New insights into the coagulopathy of liver disease and liver transplantation.

Authors:  M Senzolo; P Burra; E Cholongitas; A-K Burroughs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease - is routine real time image guidance unnecessary?

Authors:  Anil John; Saad Al Kaabi; Madiha Emran Soofi; Muneera Mohannadi; Salva Manam Kandath; Moataz Derbala; Rafie Yakoub; Esra Mohammed Al-Ahdal; Manik Sharma; Hamid Wani; Nazeeh Dweik; Anjum John; Mohammed Tariq Butt
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-19

10.  Portalsystemic hemodynamic changes in chronic severe hepatitis B: An ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  Zhong-Zhen Su; Hong Shan; Wei-Min Ke; Bing-Jun He; Rong-Qin Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.