BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated that planned coronary stenting may lower restenosis rate in patients with de novo short lesions. In a prospective study we sought to determine the frequency of restenosis, reocclusion, and adverse cardiovascular events after coronary stenting in a series of 258 consecutive nonselected patients, including those with complex lesions not fulfilling past and ongoing randomized trial criteria for stent implantation. METHODS: Criteria for stenting were as follows: (1) dissection associated with occlusion or threatened closure, (2) a residual percentage stenosis > 30% or nonocclusive dissection, (3) restenotic lesion or chronic total occlusion. RESULTS: In most cases (89%) the target lesion had two or more unfavorable morphologic characteristics, whereas only 11% of target lesions could be classified as type A or B1 lesions. Overall, the 6-month restenosis rate was 23%. By use of subgroup analysis restenosis rate was found to range widely, from 11% to 46%. With multivariate analysis, only four variables were found to be independently related to restenosis: age > 63 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.651, p = 0.011), female sex (OR = 3.807, p = 0.002), lesion length > 12 mm (OR 3.185, p = 0.002), and type C lesion (OR 2.527, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Results from randomized trials on coronary stenting cannot be extrapolated to current clinical practice because most of the treated lesions do not fulfill the criteria adopted in these studies for stent implantation. The restenosis rate is nearly four times greater for long and complex lesions treated by multiple stent implantation as compared with simple lesions, and additional studies need to be performed to evaluate the efficacy of stenting on these lesions.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated that planned coronary stenting may lower restenosis rate in patients with de novo short lesions. In a prospective study we sought to determine the frequency of restenosis, reocclusion, and adverse cardiovascular events after coronary stenting in a series of 258 consecutive nonselected patients, including those with complex lesions not fulfilling past and ongoing randomized trial criteria for stent implantation. METHODS: Criteria for stenting were as follows: (1) dissection associated with occlusion or threatened closure, (2) a residual percentage stenosis > 30% or nonocclusive dissection, (3) restenotic lesion or chronic total occlusion. RESULTS: In most cases (89%) the target lesion had two or more unfavorable morphologic characteristics, whereas only 11% of target lesions could be classified as type A or B1 lesions. Overall, the 6-month restenosis rate was 23%. By use of subgroup analysis restenosis rate was found to range widely, from 11% to 46%. With multivariate analysis, only four variables were found to be independently related to restenosis: age > 63 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.651, p = 0.011), female sex (OR = 3.807, p = 0.002), lesion length > 12 mm (OR 3.185, p = 0.002), and type C lesion (OR 2.527, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Results from randomized trials on coronary stenting cannot be extrapolated to current clinical practice because most of the treated lesions do not fulfill the criteria adopted in these studies for stent implantation. The restenosis rate is nearly four times greater for long and complex lesions treated by multiple stent implantation as compared with simple lesions, and additional studies need to be performed to evaluate the efficacy of stenting on these lesions.
Authors: Carsten Rist; Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas Flohr; Bernd J Wintersperger; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jason M Edwards; Zachary P Neeb; Mouhamad A Alloosh; Xin Long; Ian N Bratz; Cassandra R Peller; James P Byrd; Sanjay Kumar; Alexander G Obukhov; Michael Sturek Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Brajesh K Lal; Kirk W Beach; Gary S Roubin; Helmi L Lutsep; Wesley S Moore; Mahmoud B Malas; David Chiu; Nicole R Gonzales; J Lee Burke; Michael Rinaldi; James R Elmore; Fred A Weaver; Craig R Narins; Malcolm Foster; Kim J Hodgson; Alexander D Shepard; James F Meschia; Robert O Bergelin; Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Thomas G Brott Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 44.182