Literature DB >> 9488305

Neurotopographic considerations in the microsurgical treatment of small acoustic neurinomas.

W T Koos1, J D Day, C Matula, D I Levy.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors studied the relationships between tumor size, location, and topographic position relative to the intact facial nerve bundles in acoustic neurinomas to determine the influence of these factors on hearing preservation postoperatively. Consistent topographic relationships were found.
METHODS: Four hundred fifty-two patients with acoustic neurinoma treated via a retrosigmoid approach were analyzed with respect to hearing preservation and facial nerve function. One hundred fifteen tumors were identified as small and were categorized as Grades I and II. Patients with Grade I tumors, that is, purely intracanalicular lesions, all had good hearing preoperatively, defined by a less than 50-dB pure tone average and 50% speech discrimination score. All 14 Grade I tumors were removed, resulting in preservation of the patient's hearing by these criteria. There were no particular topographic anatomical relationships associated with these tumors that affected hearing preservation. Grade II tumors, defined as those protruding into the cerebellopontine angle without contacting the brainstem, were found in 101 patients and were divided by size into two grades: IIA (< 1 cm) and IIB (1-1.8 cm). In 90 patients with Grade IIA tumors, 72 (89%) of 81 who had preserved hearing preoperatively maintained it postoperatively, and in the 11 patients with Grade IIB tumors, six of whom had good hearing preoperatively, four (67%) had preserved hearing postoperatively. Six morphological types were identified based on their neurotopographic relationships to the elements of the vestibulocochlear nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: Hearing preservation postsurgery by tumor type was as follows: 1A, 92%; 1B, 88%; 1C, 100%; 2A, 83%; 2B, 92%; and 3, 57%. Combined, this represents a hearing preservation rate of 87% after surgical treatment of Grade II acoustic neurinomas. Full nerve function was maintained in 88% of patients with anatomically preserved facial nerves in both Grade I and II tumors. The remaining 12% of patients retained partial function of the facial nerve. Two patients in the series lost anatomical integrity of the nerve due to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9488305     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  58 in total

1.  The impact of MRI steady-state sequences as an additional assessment modality in vestibular schwannoma patients after LINAC stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery.

Authors:  Julian P Sauer; Thomas M Kinfe; Bogdan Pintea; Andreas Schäfer; Jan P Boström
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Should we be moving to a national standardized non-gadolinium MR imaging protocol for the surveillance of vestibular schwannomas?

Authors:  Stuart Currie; David Saunders; Jeremy Macmullen-Price; Sanjay Verma; Philip Ayres; Caroline Tait; Ceryl Harwood; Andrew Scarsbrook; Ian J Craven
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of vestibular schwannoma : Hearing preservation, vestibular function, and local control following primary and salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Florian Putz; Jan Müller; Caterina Wimmer; Nicole Goerig; Stefan Knippen; Heinrich Iro; Philipp Grundtner; Ilker Eyüpoglu; Karl Rössler; Sabine Semrau; Rainer Fietkau; Sebastian Lettmaier
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  [Preoperative determination of nerve of origin in patients with vestibular schwannoma. German version].

Authors:  T Rahne; S Plößl; S K Plontke; C Strauss
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Long term results of primary radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Stephen Johnson; Hideyuki Kano; Andrew Faramand; Matthew Pease; Aya Nakamura; Mohab Hassib; David Spencer; Nathaniel Sisterson; Amir H Faraji; Yoshio Arai; Edward Monaco; Ajay Niranjan; John C Flickinger; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Dorsal displacement of the facial nerve in acoustic neuroma surgery: clinical features and surgical outcomes of 21 consecutive dorsal pattern cases.

Authors:  Takahide Nejo; Michihiro Kohno; Osamu Nagata; Shigeo Sora; Hiroaki Sato
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Clinical features of vestibular schwannomas in patients who experience hearing improvement after surgery.

Authors:  Michihiro Kohno; Shigeo Sora; Hiroaki Sato; Masanobu Shinogami; Hidehiko Yoneyama
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Small Vestibular Schwannomas: Does Surgery Remain a Viable Treatment Option?

Authors:  Amjad N Anaizi; Vincent V DiNapoli; Myles Pensak; Philip V Theodosopoulos
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-10-08

9.  Multishell Diffusion MRI-Based Tractography of the Facial Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  M Castellaro; M Moretto; V Baro; S Brigadoi; E Zanoletti; M Anglani; L Denaro; R Dell'Acqua; A Landi; F Causin; D d'Avella; A Bertoldo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates Following Surgery for Cerebellopontine Angle Schwannomas.

Authors:  Hossein Mahboubi; Yarah M Haidar; Omid Moshtaghi; Kasra Ziai; Yaser Ghavami; Marlon Maducdoc; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.