Literature DB >> 30633539

Should we be moving to a national standardized non-gadolinium MR imaging protocol for the surveillance of vestibular schwannomas?

Stuart Currie1, David Saunders1, Jeremy Macmullen-Price1, Sanjay Verma2, Philip Ayres3, Caroline Tait3, Ceryl Harwood3, Andrew Scarsbrook4, Ian J Craven1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : To examine whether the model of Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) could be relevant to the surveillance of non-operated vestibular schwannomas (vs) by testing the following hypotheses: (1) in the UK there is a great variation in the imaging protocol for the follow-up of vs; (2) high-resolution, T 2 weighted MRI (HRT 2W-MRI) has an equivalent accuracy to gadolinium-enhanced T 1 weighted MRI (Gd-MRI) in the assessment of vs size and; (3) imaging with HRT 2W-MRI rather than Gd-MRI could offer financial savings.
METHODS: : Two neuroradiologists independently performed measurements of 50 vs imaged with HRT 2W-MRI and Gd-MRI. Differences in mean tumour measurements between HRT 2W-MRI and Gd-MRI were determined, as were intra- and interobserver concordance. Level of agreement was measured using Bland-Altman plots. Consultant neuroradiologists within 30 adult neurosurgical units in the UK were contacted via email and asked to provide the MRI protocol used for the surveillance of non-operated vs in their institution. The financial difference between scanning with HRT 2W-MRI and Gd-MRI was determined within Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
RESULTS: : There was no statistically significant difference in the mean diameter of vs size, measured on HRT 2W-MRI and Gd-MRI (p = 0.28 & p = 0.74 for observers 1 and 2 respectively). Inter- and intraobserver concordance were excellent (Interclass correlation coefficient = 0.99, Interclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.98 respectively). Differences between the two sequences were within limits of agreement. 26 of 30 UK neuroscience centres (87 % response rate) provided imaging protocols. 16 of the 26 (62%) centres use Gd-MRI for the surveillance of vs. HRT 2-MRI is £36.91 cheaper per patient than Gd-MRI.
CONCLUSION: : Variation exits across UK centres in the imaging surveillance of non-operated vs. HRT 2W-MRI and Gd-MRI have equivalent accuracy when measuring vs. Imaging with HRT 2W-MRI rather than Gd-MRI offers potential financial savings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: This study highlights the potential health and economic benefits of a national standardized imaging protocol for the surveillance of non-operated vs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30633539      PMCID: PMC6540864          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Analysis of vestibular schwannoma size in multiple dimensions: a comparative cohort study of different measurement techniques.

Authors:  J K Varughese; T Wentzel-Larsen; F Vassbotn; G Moen; M Lund-Johansen
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  Screening for cerebellopontine angle tumors: is a CISS sufficient?

Authors:  Einar Goebell; Thorsten Ries; Thomas Kucinski; Ullrich Grzyska; Bernd Eckert; Jens Fiehler; Britta Eickhoff; Jan Regelsberger; Christoph Koch; Herrmann Zeumer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  True incidence of vestibular schwannoma?

Authors:  Sven-Eric Stangerup; Mirko Tos; Jens Thomsen; Per Caye-Thomasen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the investigation of sensorineural hearing loss: is contrast enhancement still necessary?

Authors:  D J Annesley-Williams; R D Laitt; J P Jenkins; R T Ramsden; J E Gillespie
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses.

Authors:  Christopher H Hunt; Robert P Hartman; Gina K Hesley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of suspected acoustic neuroma: a systematic review of clinical and cost effectiveness and natural history.

Authors:  H Fortnum; C O'Neill; R Taylor; R Lenthall; T Nikolopoulos; G Lightfoot; G O'Donoghue; S Mason; D Baguley; H Jones; C Mulvaney
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas - second review of a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  V V Raut; R M Walsh; A P Bath; M L Bance; A Guha; C H Tator; J A Rutka
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-10

8.  A protocol for the conservative management of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Thomas P C Martin; Latha Senthil; Swarapsinh V Chavda; Richard Walsh; Richard M Irving
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Treatment of vestibular schwannomas. Why, when and how?

Authors:  E Myrseth; P-H Pedersen; P Møller; M Lund-Johansen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Follow-up assessment of vestibular schwannomas: volume quantification versus two-dimensional measurements.

Authors:  Rick van de Langenberg; Bert Jan de Bondt; Patty J Nelemans; Brigitta G Baumert; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.