Literature DB >> 9487208

Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.

V Ross1, G Naseef, G Lin, M Kelly, N Michaud, T J Flotte, J Raythen, R R Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that picosecond laser pulses are more effective than nanosecond domain pulses in clearing of tattoos.
DESIGN: Intratattoo comparison trial of 2 laser treatment modalities.
SETTING: A large interdisciplinary biomedical laser laboratory on the campus of a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with black tattoos were enrolled; all 16 patients completed the study. INTERVENTION: We treated designated parts of the same tattoo with 35-picosecond and 10-nanosecond pulses from 2 neodymium:YAG lasers. Patients received a total of 4 treatments at 4-week intervals. All laser pulse parameters were held constant except pulse duration. Radiation exposure was 0.65 J/cm2 at the skin surface. Biopsies were performed for routine microscopic and electron microscopic analysis at the initial treatment session and 4 weeks after the final treatment in 8 consenting patients. Also, ink samples were irradiated in vitro. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In vivo, on the completion of treatment, a panel of dermatologists not associated with the study (and blinded to the treatment type) evaluated photographs to assess tattoo lightening. Formalin-fixed specimens were examined for qualitative epidermal and dermal changes as well as depth of pigment alteration. Electron micrographs were examined for particle electron density and size changes (in vivo and in vitro). The gross in vitro optical density changes were measured.
RESULTS: In 12 of 16 tattoos, there was significant lightening in the picosecond-treated areas compared with those treated with nanosecond pulses. Mean depth of pigment alteration was greater for picosecond pulses, but the difference was not significant. In vivo biopsy specimens showed similar electron-lucent changes for both pulse durations. In vitro results were similar for both pulse durations, showing increases in particle sizes and decreased electron density as well as gross ink lightening.
CONCLUSIONS: Picosecond pulses are more efficient than nanosecond pulses in clearing black tattoos. Black tattoos clear principally by laser-induced changes in the intrinsic optical properties of the ink.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9487208     DOI: 10.1001/archderm.134.2.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  33 in total

Review 1.  Lasers for tattoo removal: a review.

Authors:  Sonal Choudhary; Mohamed L Elsaie; Angel Leiva; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Laser tattoo removal.

Authors:  Eric F Bernstein
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Causes and recommendations for unanticipated ink retention following tattoo removal treatment.

Authors:  William Kirby; Cynthia L Chen; Alpesh Desai; Tejas Desai
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2013-07

4.  Theoretical review of the treatment of pigmented lesions in Asian skin.

Authors:  Taro Kono; Samantha Y Shek; Henry H L Chan; William F Groff; Kotaro Imagawa; Tadashi Akamatsu
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 5.  Laser assisted tattoo removal - state of the art and new developments.

Authors:  W Bäumler; K T Weiß
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Q-switched double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm nanosecond laser vs. double frequency Nd:YAG 532-nm picosecond laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians.

Authors:  Vasanop Vachiramon; Wimolsiri Iamsumang; Korn Triyangkulsri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Comparison of fractional neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser and fractional 1550-nm erbium fiber laser in facial acne scar treatment.

Authors:  Pamela Chayavichitsilp; Preeyachat Limtong; Korn Triyangkulsri; Nathathai Pratumchart
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 8.  The picosecond laser for tattoo removal.

Authors:  Vincent M Hsu; Adam S Aldahan; Stephanie Mlacker; Vidhi V Shah; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of Q-switched and picosecond lasers in the treatment of nevus of Ota: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie M Williams; Pooja Gurnani; Jun Long; John Reynolds; Yue Pan; Takahiro Suzuki; Ghadah I Alhetheli; Keyvan Nouri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Visualization of laser tattoo removal treatment effects in a mouse model by two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Jang; Yeoreum Yoon; Wonjoong Kim; Soonjae Kwon; Seunghun Lee; Duke Song; Jong Woon Choi; Ki Hean Kim
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.