Literature DB >> 23882312

Causes and recommendations for unanticipated ink retention following tattoo removal treatment.

William Kirby1, Cynthia L Chen, Alpesh Desai, Tejas Desai.   

Abstract

While placement of ink into the skin is a long-standing tradition, patients are now seeking tattoo removal on a more frequent basis. Once considered acceptable removal options, tattoo ink removal via physical destruction included dermabrasion, chemical destruction, salabrasion, thermal destruction, and cryotherapy. Now these options are used extremely infrequently. These modalities provided unpredictable results and often required prolonged healing times and left patients with skin discoloration, pain, scarring, and ink retention. Even the widely adopted use of lasers, now considered the gold standard method, offers some level of unpredictability surrounding the natural progression of ink resolution. Multiple factors need to be taken into consideration when successfully removing tattoo pigment including the modalities used, number and frequency of treatments, proper device technique, and physiological barriers to tattoo removal. This paper serves to elucidate the common causes of ink retention following tattoo removal treatment with recommendations on how best to address this relatively common occurrence.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23882312      PMCID: PMC3718753     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol        ISSN: 1941-2789


  38 in total

1.  Tattoo removal by superficial dermabrasion. Five-year experience.

Authors:  W A Clabaugh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Tattoos: a review of tattoo practices and potential treatment options for removal.

Authors:  Susan M Sweeney
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 3.  Basic laser principles.

Authors:  R M Herd; J S Dover; K A Arndt
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Successful and rapid treatment of blue and green tattoo pigment with a novel picosecond laser.

Authors:  Jeremy A Brauer; Kavitha K Reddy; Robert Anolik; Elliot T Weiss; Julie K Karen; Elizabeth K Hale; Lori A Brightman; Leonard Bernstein; Roy G Geronemus
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2012-07

5.  Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.

Authors:  V Ross; G Naseef; G Lin; M Kelly; N Michaud; T J Flotte; J Raythen; R R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1998-02

Review 6.  The removal of digital tattoos.

Authors:  G B Colver; R P Dawber
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.736

7.  Tattoo removal using a liquid nitrogen cryospray.

Authors:  G B Colver; R P Dawber
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.470

8.  Tattoo removal using infra-red coagulation.

Authors:  G B Colver; G W Cherry; R P Dawber; T J Ryan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Salabrasion of tattoos. A correlation of the clinical and histological results.

Authors:  W A Koerber; N M Price
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1978-06

Review 10.  Cutaneous allergic reactions to tattoo ink.

Authors:  Ravneet Ruby Kaur; William Kirby; Howard Maibach
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  6 in total

1.  The 'Magic Light': A Discussion on Laser Ethics.

Authors:  Andreas Stylianou; Michael A Talias
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Second degree skin burn with garlic and table salt.

Authors:  Yakup Cil
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

3.  Optimising laser tattoo removal.

Authors:  Kabir Sardana; Rashmi Ranjan; Sneha Ghunawat
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  Original Method to Repigment Achromic Laser Tattoo Removal Scars.

Authors:  Samir Arbache; Dirlene Roth; Samia Trigo Arbache; Sergio Henrique Hirata
Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-23

5.  A Prospective Open-labeled Study of Tattoo Removal with Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Utilizing the R0 Technique and Correlation with Kirby-Desai Scale.

Authors:  Sanjeev J Aurangabadkar; Swapnil D Shah; Deepak S Kulkarni; Madhavi S Auragabadkar
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Rapid, high-fluence multi-pass q-switched laser treatment of tattoos with a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch: A pilot study.

Authors:  Brian S Biesman; Michael P O'Neil; Cara Costner
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.025

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.