Literature DB >> 9484435

Editing site recognition in plant mitochondria: the importance of 5'-flanking sequences.

M A Williams1, B M Kutcher, R M Mulligan.   

Abstract

Cytidine to uridine (C-to-U) editing occurs in plant mitochondria with very high specificity such that only specific cytidines are converted to uridines. The mechanisms for editing site selection in plant mitochondria are unknown. In order to examine the determinants of editing site recognition, repeated mitochondrial DNA sequences that include edited nucleotides have been evaluated as editing substrates. During evolution the maize mitochondrial ribosomal protein subunit 12 (rps12) gene recombined with intron 1 of the ribosomal protein subunit 3 (rps3) gene and a region of the S1-like sequence of the 2.3 kb plasmid. These recombinations created a second copy of an internal portion of the rps12 gene, known as rps12b, which includes the first four editing sites of rps12 transcripts. The duplicated sequence extends seven nucleotides upstream of editing site 1 and six nucleotides downstream from editing site 4. The sequences of rps12 and rps12b are identical between these sites except for a single change at -5 from editing site 1. These modifications did not effect C-to-U conversion at editing sites 2, 3, or 4 in rps12b; however, no editing was detected at editing site 1 in rps12b cDNAs. Thus, the 5' recombination abolished editing at site I, while the 3' recombination modified the downstream RNA sequence, but did not effect editing at site IV. Secondary structure prediction suggests that changes in editing site recognition do not correlate with differences in secondary structures, and that primary RNA sequence may be responsible for editing site specification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9484435     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005961718612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  27 in total

1.  Editing of the wheat coxIII transcript: evidence for twelve C to U and one U to C conversions and for sequence similarities around editing sites.

Authors:  J M Gualberto; J H Weil; J M Grienenberger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Expression of the wheat mitochondrial nad3-rps12 transcription unit: correlation between editing and mRNA maturation.

Authors:  J M Gualberto; G Bonnard; L Lamattina; J M Grienenberger
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  RNA editing intermediates of cox2 transcripts in maize mitochondria.

Authors:  A J Yang; R M Mulligan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  RNA editing in plant mitochondria.

Authors:  P S Covello; M W Gray
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  RNA editing in plant mitochondria.

Authors:  R Hiesel; B Wissinger; W Schuster; A Brennicke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Molecular analysis of the linear 2.3 kb plasmid of maize mitochondria: apparent capture of tRNA genes.

Authors:  P Leon; V Walbot; P Bedinger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-06-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  In vivo dissection of cis-acting determinants for plastid RNA editing.

Authors:  R Bock; M Hermann; H Kössel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Splicing and editing of rps10 transcripts in potato mitochondria.

Authors:  S Zanlungo; V Quiñones; A Moenne; L Holuigue; X Jordana
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 9.  Sense from nonsense: RNA editing in mitochondria of kinetoplastid protozoa and slime molds.

Authors:  L Simpson; O H Thiemann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The NCS3 mutation: genetic evidence for the expression of ribosomal protein genes in Zea mays mitochondria.

Authors:  M D Hunt; K J Newton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  8 in total

1.  Higher plant mitochondria

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Cross-competition in transgenic chloroplasts expressing single editing sites reveals shared cis elements.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Chateigner-Boutin; Maureen R Hanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Different patterns in the recognition of editing sites in plant mitochondria.

Authors:  David Choury; Jean-Claude Farré; Xavier Jordana; Alejandro Araya
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  RNA editing site recognition in heterologous plant mitochondria.

Authors:  David Choury; Alejandro Araya
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  cis Recognition elements in plant mitochondrion RNA editing.

Authors:  J C Farré; G Leon; X Jordana; A Araya
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Electroporation of isolated higher-plant mitochondria: transcripts of an introduced cox2 gene, but not an atp6 gene, are edited in organello.

Authors:  M Staudinger; F Kempken
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction.

Authors:  James Thompson; Shuba Gopal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Simple statistical models predict C-to-U edited sites in plant mitochondrial RNA.

Authors:  Michael P Cummings; Daniel S Myers
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.