Literature DB >> 9481234

Rating satisfaction research: is it poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent?

M T Di Palo1.   

Abstract

Satisfaction is one of the core outcome measures for health care. It is intuitively more appealing than measures of health care effectiveness or efficiency that are more difficult to understand. Satisfaction with health care is a measure with a long history in the social sciences. Most current research is less interested in correlations between patient characteristics and satisfaction and more focused on improving the quality of care and service delivered to patients and health plan members. While this article provides a brief overview of historical satisfaction literature, the primary focus is on current trends in measuring satisfaction, including efforts by the National Committee for Quality Assurance and the Foundation for Accountability. Limitations of current satisfaction measures are discussed; alternatives to using satisfaction to understand the experience of the health care system are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9481234     DOI: 10.1002/art.1790100610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res        ISSN: 0893-7524


  13 in total

Review 1.  Methods for the analysis of ordinal response data in medical image quality assessment.

Authors:  Claire Keeble; Paul D Baxter; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Laura A Treadgold; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  THE INFLUENCE OF RACE AND ETHNICITY IN CLIENTS' EXPERIENCES OF MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT.

Authors:  Oanh L Meyer; Nolan Zane
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Problematic resident-patient relationships: the patient' s perspective.

Authors:  C Boutin-Foster; M E Charlson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Evaluating patient experience in a cystic fibrosis centre using a disease-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire.

Authors:  Helmut Ellemunter; Katja Stahl; Ulrike Smrekar; Gratiana Steinkamp
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Patient-centered culturally sensitive health care: model testing and refinement.

Authors:  Carolyn M Tucker; Michael Marsiske; Kenneth G Rice; Jessica Jones Nielson; Keith Herman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 6.  A systematic review of economic evaluations of population-based sodium reduction interventions.

Authors:  Silvia F Hope; Jacqui Webster; Kathy Trieu; Arti Pillay; Merina Ieremia; Colin Bell; Wendy Snowdon; Bruce Neal; Marj Moodie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Views of diverse primary care patients on the roles of healthcare providers and staff and the influence of other variables in their weight management.

Authors:  C M Tucker; J L Williams; G M Wippold; L A Bilello; T A Morrissette; A J Good; N R Shah; N E Rowland
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2017-10-20

8.  Patient satisfaction in the outpatients' chemotherapy unit of Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey: a staff survey.

Authors:  Nazim S Turhal; Basak Efe; Mahmut Gumus; Mehmet Aliustaoglu; Ayla Karamanoglu; Meric Sengoz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  European Portuguese Version of the User Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (USEQ): Transcultural Adaptation and Validation Study.

Authors:  Célia Domingos; Patrício Soares Costa; Nadine Correia Santos; José Miguel Pêgo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Alpha lipoic acid with pulsed radiofrequency in treatment of chronic lumbosacral radicular pain: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Khaled A Abdelrahman; Abdelrady S Ibrahim; Ayman M Osman; Mohamed G Aly; Abdelhady S Ali; Waleed S Farrag
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.