Literature DB >> 11722689

Problematic resident-patient relationships: the patient' s perspective.

C Boutin-Foster1, M E Charlson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to identify the characteristics of a problematic doctor-patient relationship from the perspective of primary care patients who are cared for by medical residents and to determine whether patients' perception of the relationship is a function of their demographic, clinical, or social attributes.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: An adult primary care practice in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-one patients whose primary care physicians were senior internal medicine residents.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients completed a questionnaire addressing several aspects of their doctor-patient relationship, the general health perception item on the SF-12, and items on social support from the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. By design of the study, approximately half of the patients had been identified by their physicians as being in problematic relationships (n = 74) and half as being in satisfying relationships (n = 77). Among patients in relationships described as satisfying by their resident, 10% viewed the relationship as problematic. Of the patients involved in relationships described as problematic by the resident, 23% viewed their relationship as problematic (P = .03). Patients who rated the relationship as problematic were much more likely to also report low social support compared to patients involved in relationships described as satisfying (76% vs 16%; P < .001). Compared to residents involved in relationships described as satisfying by their patients, residents in problematic relationships were more likely to be described as being less accessible and less capable of handling medical complaints (P < . 001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients were more likely to describe the doctor-patient relationship as problematic if they felt that the resident was less accessible or less capable of handling medical complaints, or if they had low self-perceived social support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11722689      PMCID: PMC1495294          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00803.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  21 in total

Review 1.  Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore.

Authors:  L Aharony; S Strasser
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1993

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress.

Authors:  S Cobb
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Associations among family support, family stress, and personal functional health status.

Authors:  G R Parkerson; J L Michener; L R Wu; J N Finch; L H Muhlbaier; K Magruder-Habib; J W Kertesz; N Clapp-Channing; D S Morrow; A L Chen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 6.  Social support and prognosis following first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H C Bucher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Frustrating patients: physician and patient perspectives among distressed high users of medical services.

Authors:  E H Lin; W Katon; M Von Korff; T Bush; P Lipscomb; J Russo; E Wagner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Physical symptoms and physician-experienced difficulty in the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  S R Hahn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Satisfaction with hospitalization: a comparative analysis of three types of services.

Authors:  S Carmel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Taking care of the hateful patient.

Authors:  J E Groves
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Taking care of patients in resident clinics: where do we stand?

Authors:  N H Fiebach; J G Wong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Research on patient-clinician relationships: celebrating success and identifying the next scope of work.

Authors:  Anthony L Suchman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Reforming internal medicine residency training. A report from the Society of General Internal Medicine's task force for residency reform.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Judith L Bowen; Michael Green; Jessica Gregg; Lorenzo DiFrancesco; Eileen Reynolds; Patrick Alguire; David Battinelli; Catherine Lucey; Daniel Duffy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Changing habits of practice. Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings.

Authors:  Judith L Bowen; Stephen M Salerno; John K Chamberlain; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Helen L Chen; Suzanne Brandenburg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Impact of Social Processes in Online Health Communities on Patient Empowerment in Relationship With the Physician: Emergence of Functional and Dysfunctional Empowerment.

Authors:  Gregor Petrič; Sara Atanasova; Tanja Kamin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.