Literature DB >> 9476202

Using structured text and templates to capture health status outcomes in the electronic health record.

S B Henry1, J A Morris, W L Holzemer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the difficulty of implementing clinical outcomes-focused quality improvement (QI) projects, most organizations' efforts and comparative quality report cards have centered on structure and process indicators or on outcomes captured in administrative data systems. Ultimately, however, health care is intended to improve health. Health status is now frequently included in the set of quality of care information requested by purchasers of health care, accrediting and governmental agencies, and consumer groups. Subsequently, users of electronic health record (EHR) systems are demanding that the EHR support the collection and comparative analysis of health status information over time and by clinical population and provider. APPROACH: As opposed to the current practice in most organizations of collecting health status data via an annual mail survey, the approach discussed in this article utilizes standardized coding and classification (SCC) systems and standardized surveys to capture health status information in the EHR during the routine course of care delivery through the use of templates built on structured text. This method is illustrated with examples from the WAVE EHR. The EHR-based structured text and template approach facilitates the incorporation of health status measurement into the documentation of the patient-provider encounter, builds on recognized SCC systems and standardized surveys, and enables information retrieval for a variety of analyses, including those focused on QI.
CONCLUSIONS: Health status outcomes are an essential component of an information set focused on health care quality. To routinely capture and analyze health status variables, SCC systems and standardized health status surveys are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9476202     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30348-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  7 in total

1.  Usability evaluation of the progress note construction set.

Authors:  S H Brown; S Hardenbrook; L Herrick; J St Onge; K Bailey; P L Elkin
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Using natural language processing to analyze physician modifications to data entry templates.

Authors:  Adam B Wilcox; Scott P Narus; Watson A Bowes
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports.

Authors:  Mark R Laflamme; Paul R Dexter; Marilyn F Graham; Siu L Hui; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  Pay for performance for salaried health care providers: methodology, challenges, and pitfalls.

Authors:  John R Britton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Family Meeting Tools in Palliative and Intensive Care Settings.

Authors:  Adam E Singer; Tayla Ash; Claudia Ochotorena; Karl A Lorenz; Kelly Chong; Scott T Shreve; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Embedded-structure template for electronic records affects patient note quality and management for emergency head injury patients: An observational pre and post comparison quality improvement study.

Authors:  Tomohiro Sonoo; Satoshi Iwai; Ryota Inokuchi; Masataka Gunshin; Yoichi Kitsuta; Susumu Nakajima
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Perspectives on electronic medical records adoption: electronic medical records (EMR) in outcomes research.

Authors:  Dan Belletti; Christopher Zacker; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2010-04-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.