Literature DB >> 11825158

Usability evaluation of the progress note construction set.

S H Brown1, S Hardenbrook, L Herrick, J St Onge, K Bailey, P L Elkin.   

Abstract

OVERVIEW: The Veterans Administration (VA) Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) is a nationally deployed software product that integrates provider order entry, progress notes, vitals, consults, discharge summaries, problem lists, medications, labs, radiology, transcribed documents, study reports, and clinical reminders. Users rapidly adopted the graphical user interface for data retrieval, but demanded options to typing for data entry. We programmed "point and click" forms that integrate with CPRS individually, but were soon overwhelmed by requests. Subsequently, we developed the Progress Note Construction Set (PNCS); a tool suite that permits subject matter experts without programming skills to create reusable "point and click" forms. In this study, we evaluate the usability of these user-constructed forms.
METHODS: An untrained, non-VA subject matter expert used the PNCS to create a graphical form for "skin tear" documentation. Ten VA nurses used the skin tear form to document findings for 7 standardized clinical scenarios. Following each scenario the subjects answered usability questions about the form.
RESULTS: The subject matter expert created the skin tear form in 78 minutes. Users found the form to facilitate their data entry (p 0.0265), and to be at least as fast (p 0.0029) and as easy to use as expected (p 0.0166). Average note entry time was 3.4 minutes.
CONCLUSION: The PNCS allowed a non-programmer to quickly create a usable, CPRS-integrated point and click form. Users found the subject matter expert s form fast and easy to use. The tool suite is a more scaleable form creation method because capacity is no longer limited by programmer availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11825158      PMCID: PMC2243587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  20 in total

1.  The transition to automated practitioner order entry in a teaching hospital: the VA Puget Sound experience.

Authors:  T H Payne
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Providing a complete online multimedia patient record.

Authors:  R E Dayhoff; P M Kuzmak; G Kirin; S Frank
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

3.  Enhancing performance measurement: NCQA's road map for a health information framework. National Committee for Quality Assurance.

Authors:  E C Schneider; V Riehl; S Courte-Wienecke; D M Eddy; C Sennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The vision for the Department of Defense's computer-based patient record.

Authors:  N Staggers
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 5.  Computers in patient care.

Authors:  G O Barnett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Recording, retrieval and review of medical data by physician-computer interaction.

Authors:  R A Greenes; G O Barnett; S W Klein; A Robbins; R E Prior
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A chartless record--is it adequate?

Authors:  W W Stead; W E Hammond; M J Straube
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  The HELP system.

Authors:  T A Pryor; R M Gardner; P D Clayton; H R Warner
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 9.  The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice.

Authors:  G O Barnett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical computing in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  H L Bleich; R F Beckley; G L Horowitz; J D Jackson; E S Moody; C Franklin; S R Goodman; M W McKay; R A Pope; T Walden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  A usability study of physicians interaction with a paper-based patient record system and a graphical-based electronic patient record system.

Authors:  Nestor J Rodriguez; Viviam Murillo; José A Borges; Johanna Ortiz; Daniel Z Sands
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Using natural language processing to analyze physician modifications to data entry templates.

Authors:  Adam B Wilcox; Scott P Narus; Watson A Bowes
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Experience in implementing inpatient clinical note capture via a provider order entry system.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Jonathan Grande; Antoine Geissbuhler; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Generating Clinical Notes for Electronic Health Record Systems.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; William W Stead; Joshua C Denny; Dario Giuse; Nancy M Lorenzi; Steven H Brown; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  SNOMED CT: utility for a general medical evaluation template.

Authors:  Steven H Brown; Peter L Elkin; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; Casey S Husser; Zelalem Temesgen; Shawn P Hardenbrook; Elliot M Fielstein; S Trent Rosenbloom
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Direct comparison of MEDCIN and SNOMED CT for representation of a general medical evaluation template.

Authors:  Steven H Brown; S Trent Rosenbloom; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; David A Froehling; Kent R Bailey; Michael J Lincoln; Diane Montella; Elliot M Fielstein; Peter L Elkin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

7.  Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu; Nancy Lorenzi; William W Stead; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  TagLine: Information Extraction for Semi-Structured Text in Medical Progress Notes.

Authors:  Dezon K Finch; James A McCart; Stephen L Luther
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

9.  Exploring Usability Issues of a Smartphone-Based Physician-to-Physician Teleconsultation App in an Orthopedic Clinic: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Songphan Choemprayong; Chris Charoenlap; Krerk Piromsopa
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 10.  Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems: Metrics and Evaluation Methods for eHealth Systems.

Authors:  Marta Weronika Wronikowska; James Malycha; Lauren J Morgan; Verity Westgate; Tatjana Petrinic; J Duncan Young; Peter J Watkinson
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.336

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.