Literature DB >> 24626075

Pay for performance for salaried health care providers: methodology, challenges, and pitfalls.

John R Britton1.   

Abstract

Pay for performance has been recommended by the Institute of Medicine as an incentive to improve the quality of health care. Traditional quality-improvement methods may be adapted to evaluate performance of salaried providers, but it is important to separate provider contributions from other influencing factors within the health care system. Accurate recording, extraction, and analysis of data together with careful selection and measurement of indicators of performance are crucial for meaningful assessment. If appropriate methodology is not used, much time, effort, and money may be expended gathering data that may be potentially misleading or even useless, with the possibility that good performance may go unrecognized and mediocre performance rewarded.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24626075      PMCID: PMC3951034          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/13-087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  32 in total

1.  New paradigms for measuring clinical performance using electronic health records.

Authors:  Jonathan P Weiner; Jinnet B Fowles; Kitty S Chan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures.

Authors:  Giles W L Boland; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Parametric versus nonparametric statistical tests: the length of stay example.

Authors:  Munirih Qualls; Daniel J Pallin; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine.

Authors:  P E Plsek
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Using structured text and templates to capture health status outcomes in the electronic health record.

Authors:  S B Henry; J A Morris; W L Holzemer
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1997-12

Review 7.  The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Anthony Scott; Peter Sivey; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Lisa Willenberg; Lucio Naccarella; John Furler; Doris Young
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

Review 8.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support?

Authors:  Dina Demner-Fushman; Wendy W Chapman; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Hospital implementation of health information technology and quality of care: are they related?

Authors:  Joseph D Restuccia; Alan B Cohen; Jedediah N Horwitt; Michael Shwartz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.