Literature DB >> 9474608

Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches.

N U Zitzmann1, P Schärer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare three different methods for sinus elevation: (1) the lateral antrostomy as a two-step procedure, (2) the lateral antrostomy as a one-step procedure, and (3) the osteotome technique with a crestal approach. Indication criteria were defined, based on the residual bone height measured from computed tomography scans, for the sake of applying the appropriate technique. STUDY: In 30 patients designated for implant treatment in the resorbed posterior maxilla, 79 implants were placed in combination with a bone-grafting material for sinus augmentation. The final bone heights were measured from panoramic radiographs or post-operative computed tomography scans.
RESULTS: The success rate for the osteotome technique was 95% during the 30-month study period; no failures occurred in any site treated with a lateral antrostomy. The gain in bone height was comparable for the one-step (median = 10 mm) and two-step (median = 12.7 mm) lateral antrostomies. These sites exhibited a significantly greater increase in bone height (p < 0.001) than did the sites in which the osteotome technique was applied (mean = 3.5 mm). The histologic sections showed both bone apposition in intimate contact with the bone-grafting material particles and initial signs of its remodeling.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the osteotome technique can be recommended when more than 6 mm of residual bone height is present and an increase of about 3 to 4 mm is expected. In cases of more advanced resorption a one-step or two-step lateral antrostomy has to be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474608     DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90391-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  40 in total

1.  [Primary implant stability with different bone surgery techniques. An in vitro study of the mandible of the minipig].

Authors:  A Büchter; J Kleinheinz; U Joos; U Meyer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-10-24

2.  [Peri-implant bone formation around cylindrical and conical implant systems].

Authors:  A Büchter; J Kleinheinz; H-P Wiesmann; L Seper; U Joos; U Meyer
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-07-23

3.  Endoscopic management of the schneiderian membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus augmentation: a case report.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; C Andrisani; S Lico; Z Ormanier; A Barlattani; L Ottria
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-16

4.  Full arch rehabilitation in severe maxillary atrophy with palatal approach implant placement: a case report.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; M A Lopez; C Andrisani; Z Ormanier; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

5.  BM-MSCs and Bio-Oss complexes enhanced new bone formation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation by promoting differentiation of BM-MSCs.

Authors:  Qian Zhou; Bo-Han Yu; Wei-Cai Liu; Zuo-Lin Wang
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Assessment of implant stability following sinus lift procedures with different grafting materials.

Authors:  Damir Jelušić; Ivan Puhar; Darije Plančak
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-03

7.  Ex vivo comparative study on three sinus lift tools for transcrestal detaching maxillary sinus mucosa.

Authors:  Yanfeng Li; Pin Hu; Yishi Han; Jiadong Fan; Xinming Dong; Huan Ren; Chunhao Yang; Tingting Shi; Dong Xia
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh; Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh; Batol Darjazini Nahas; Salam Rajih
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials.

Authors:  A Martinez; J Franco; E Saiz; F Guitian
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

10.  Bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous placement of non-submerged sand blasted with large grit and acid etched implants: a 5-year radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Jee-Hee Jung; Seong-Ho Choi; Kyoo-Sung Cho; Chang-Sung Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.