Literature DB >> 18343426

Risk stratification for biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Jayakrishnan Jayachandran1, Lionel L Bañez, Donna E Levy, William J Aronson, Martha K Terris, Joseph C Presti, Christopher L Amling, Christopher J Kane, Stephen J Freedland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In men with extracapsular disease or positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy immediate adjuvant therapy decreases the risk of biochemical recurrence at the cost of increased toxicity. We further stratified these men into a low risk group in which watchful waiting after surgery may be preferred and a high risk cohort in which adjuvant therapy may be preferred.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the records of 902 men treated with radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal-Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database between 1988 and 2007 with positive surgical margins and/or extracapsular disease without seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastasis. The significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Based on the recurrence risk generated from the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model we generated tables to estimate the risk of recurrence-free survival 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.
RESULTS: At a median of 3 years of followup 346 patients (39%) had biochemical recurrence. On multivariate analysis the significant predictors of biochemical recurrence were age more than 60 years, prostate specific antigen more than 10 ng/ml, Gleason score 4 + 3 and 8-10, 2 or more sites of positive surgical margins and prostate specimen weight 30 gm or less. As determined by the concordance index, the overall predictive accuracy of the model was 0.67, while it was 0.60 for the postoperative Kattan nomogram in this patient population.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a simple instrument that, once validated, may aid in the postoperative decision making process for men at intermediate risk for recurrence after prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18343426      PMCID: PMC3179686          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  J I Epstein
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Messing; J Manola; M Sarosdy; G Wilding; E D Crawford; D Trump
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Race as an outcome predictor after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Christopher L Amling; Frederick Dorey; Christopher J Kane; Joseph C Presti; Martha K Terris; William J Aronson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Jonathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results.

Authors:  Kimberly A Roehl; Misop Han; Christian G Ramos; Jo Ann V Antenor; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; M Schnall; J E Tomaszewski; A Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence for experimental adjuvant therapy following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A W Partin; S Piantadosi; M G Sanda; J I Epstein; F F Marshall; J L Mohler; C B Brendler; P C Walsh; J W Simons
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Joseph C Presti; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Frederick Dorey; Christopher L Amling
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence and Correlation with Various Parameters After Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Mahendra Singh; Sachin Kathuria; Saurabh Jain; Shahnawaz Rasool; Vipin Tyagi; Manu Gupta; Mrinal Pahwa; Himanshu Pandey; Ajay Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-14

3.  Chemokine markers predict biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy.

Authors:  David L Blum; Tatsuki Koyama; Amosy E M'Koma; Juan M Iturregui; Magaly Martinez-Ferrer; Consolate Uwamariya; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark; Neil A Bhowmick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Diederik M Somford; Inge M van Oort; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; J Alfred Witjes; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Bertrand Tombal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; James A Eastham
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

7.  Indications for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer after surgery with positive surgical margins.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kamecki; Marta Biedka; Roman Makarewicz; Jerzy Siekiera
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-10-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.