Literature DB >> 9474061

A MEG analysis of the P300 in visual discrimination tasks.

A Mecklinger1, B Maess, B Opitz, E Pfeifer, D Cheyne, H Weinberg.   

Abstract

Based on recent research that indicated that P300 scalp topography varies as a function of task and/or information to be processed, this study examined scalp-recorded magnetic fields correlated with the P300 by means of whole-head magnetoencephalography. Subjects performed two discrimination tasks, in which targets, defined on either object or spatial characteristics of the same visual stimuli, had to be discriminated. Based on the across-subject root mean square (RMS) functions a sequence of 4 components could be identified in both tasks, N1m, P3m, and two later components, which, based on their estimated neuronal sources, were classified as representing motor processes during and following the manual responses to target stimuli. Reliable between-task differences in source localization were obtained for the P3m component, but not for the other components. Inferior-medial sources were found for the P3m evoked by both spatial and object targets, with these sources being located about 3.5 cm more anterior for object targets. These results suggest that different neuronal sources, possibly located in subcortical regions in the vicinity of the thalamus, contribute to the P3m evoked by target stimuli defined by either object or spatial stimulus characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474061     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00092-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  12 in total

1.  Investigating the generators of the scalp recorded visuo-verbal P300 using cortically constrained source localization.

Authors:  Kathryn A Moores; C Richard Clark; Jo L M Hadfield; Greg C Brown; D James Taylor; Sean P Fitzgibbon; Andrew C Lewis; Darren L Weber; Richard Greenblatt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Within-subject joint independent component analysis of simultaneous fMRI/ERP in an auditory oddball paradigm.

Authors:  J Mangalathu-Arumana; S A Beardsley; E Liebenthal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Auditory P3 in antidepressant pharmacotherapy treatment responders, non-responders and controls.

Authors:  Natalia Jaworska; Elisea De Somma; Claude Blondeau; Pierre Tessier; Sandhaya Norris; Wendy Fusee; Dylan Smith; Pierre Blier; Verner Knott
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.600

4.  Sequential temporo-fronto-temporal activation during monitoring of the auditory environment for temporal patterns.

Authors:  Eric Halgren; Jason Sherfey; Andrei Irimia; Anders M Dale; Ksenija Marinkovic
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL STUDY OF ATTENTION REGULATION DURING ILLUSORY FIGURE CATEGORIZATION TASK IN ADHD, AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER, AND TYPICAL CHILDREN.

Authors:  Estate M Sokhadze; Joshua M Baruth; Lonnie Sears; Guela E Sokhadze; Ayman S El-Baz; Emily Williams; Robert Klapheke; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  J Neurother       Date:  2012-03-02

6.  Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.

Authors:  Katharine Molloy; Timothy D Griffiths; Maria Chait; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Right hemisphere has the last laugh: neural dynamics of joke appreciation.

Authors:  Ksenija Marinkovic; Sharelle Baldwin; Maureen G Courtney; Thomas Witzel; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Objective markers of drug effects on brain function from recordings of scalp potential in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Peter H Boeijinga
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.986

9.  Real-world objects are more memorable than photographs of objects.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Snow; Rafal M Skiba; Taylor L Coleman; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Neural signatures of stimulus features in visual working memory--a spatiotemporal approach.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Margaret C Jackson; Christoph Klein; Harald Mohr; Kimron L Shapiro; David E J Linden
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.