Literature DB >> 23664712

Auditory P3 in antidepressant pharmacotherapy treatment responders, non-responders and controls.

Natalia Jaworska1, Elisea De Somma, Claude Blondeau, Pierre Tessier, Sandhaya Norris, Wendy Fusee, Dylan Smith, Pierre Blier, Verner Knott.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs), derived from electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings, can index electrocortical activity related to cognitive operations. The fronto-central P3a ERP is involved in involuntary processing of novel auditory information, whereas the parietal P3b indexes controlled attention processing. The amplitude of the auditory P3b has been found to be decreased in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, few studies have examined the relations between the P3b, the related P3a, and antidepressant treatment response. We tested 53 unmedicated individuals (25 females) with MDD, as well as 43 non-depressed controls (23 females) on the novelty oddball task, wherein infrequent deviant (target) and frequent standard (non-target) tones were presented, along with infrequent novel (non-target/distractor) sounds. The P3a and P3b ERPs were assessed to novel and target sounds, respectively, as were their accompanying behavioral performance measures. Depression ratings and the antidepressant response status were assessed following 12 weeks of pharmacotherapy with three different regimens. Antidepressant treatment non-responders had smaller baseline P3a/b amplitudes than responders and healthy controls. Baseline P3b amplitude also weakly predicted the extent of depression rating changes by week 12. Females exhibited larger P3a/b amplitudes than males. With respect to task performance, controls had more target hits than treatment non-responders. ERP measures correlated with clinical changes in males and with behavioral measures in females. These results suggest that greater (or control-like) baseline P3a/b amplitudes are associated with a positive antidepressant response, and that gender differences characterize the P3 and, by extension, basic attentive processes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidepressant drugs; Major depressive disorder (MDD); P3a; P3b; Prediction; Sex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23664712      PMCID: PMC3744638          DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  57 in total

1.  Deficits in hippocampal and anterior cingulate functioning during verbal declarative memory encoding in midlife major depression.

Authors:  J Douglas Bremner; Meena Vythilingam; Eric Vermetten; Viola Vaccarino; Dennis S Charney
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  P300, handedness, and corpus callosal size: gender, modality, and task.

Authors:  L D Hoffman; J Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Effects of aerobic exercise and gender on visual and auditory P300, reaction time, and accuracy.

Authors:  Y Yagi; K L Coburn; K M Estes; J E Arruda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1999-10

5.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

6.  Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300.

Authors:  S Yamaguchi; R T Knight
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Event-related potential based evidence of cognitive dysfunction in patients during the first episode of depression using a novelty oddball task.

Authors:  Jing lv; Lun Zhao; Jingjing Gong; Changsheng Chen; Danmin Miao
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Differences in depressive symptom profile between males and females.

Authors:  Daniel J Smith; Sarah Kyle; Liz Forty; Carly Cooper; James Walters; Elen Russell; Sian Caesar; Anne Farmer; Peter McGuffin; Ian Jones; Lisa Jones; Nick Craddock
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  The P300 ERP component: an index of cognitive dysfunction in depression?

Authors:  G Sara; E Gordon; C Kraiuhin; S Coyle; A Howson; R Meares
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Familial risk for depression and p3b component as a possible neurocognitive vulnerability marker.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Ute Hauser; Claudia Conty; Hinderk M Emrich; Detlef E Dietrich
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.328

View more
  7 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic Biomarkers for Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Illness: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alik S Widge; M Taha Bilge; Rebecca Montana; Weilynn Chang; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Thilo Deckersbach; Linda L Carpenter; Ned H Kalin; Charles B Nemeroff
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Atypical Temporal Dynamics of Resting State Shapes Stimulus-Evoked Activity in Depression-An EEG Study on Rest-Stimulus Interaction.

Authors:  Annemnarie Wolff; Sara de la Salle; Alana Sorgini; Emma Lynn; Pierre Blier; Verner Knott; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  The Association of P300 Components With Clinical Characteristics and Efficacy of Pharmacotherapy in Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Changjiang Wu; Li Wu; Xinxin Fan; Tingting Zeng; Li Xu; Yujun Wei; Yan Zhang; Hongxuan Wang; Ying Peng; Chuanyuan Kang; Jianzhong Yang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Using EEG to Predict Clinical Response to Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depression: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Louis Simon; Martin Blay; Filipe Galvao; Jerome Brunelin
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Sex differences in the prediction of the effectiveness of paroxetine for patients with major depressive disorder identified using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for early response.

Authors:  Tetsu Tomita; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Yasui-Furukori Norio; Yasushi Sato; Taku Nakagami; Shoko Tsuchimine; Ayako Kaneda; Sunao Kaneko
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Effects of Gender and Apolipoprotein E on Novelty MMN and P3a in Healthy Elderly and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Lijuan Gao; Jiu Chen; Lihua Gu; Hao Shu; Zan Wang; Duan Liu; Yanna Yan; Zhijun Zhang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  No interaction between rivastigmine and citalopram on memory and novelty processing in healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  Pra Heckman; A Blokland; A Sambeth
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.