Literature DB >> 9472241

"Not as bad as it could have been": assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics.

K Kavanaugh1, L Ayres.   

Abstract

Research on sensitive subjects such as perinatal loss places participants at particular risk for psychological distress. Although authors have discussed strategies for minimizing distress during interview research, less is known about the ways participants communicate and investigators respond to psychological pain incurred during the interview itself. Therefore, we describe both verbal and nonverbal indicators of distress during a phenomenological study on perinatal loss. We also offer suggestions for interviewers on ways to minimize participants' discomfort. We believe this account will help other researchers identify and reduce respondent distress during their own research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9472241     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199802)21:1<91::aid-nur10>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  21 in total

1.  Ethical tensions in genetic counselling research.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2011-03

2.  Challenges and strategies for recruitment and retention of vulnerable research participants: promoting the benefits of participation.

Authors:  Robin Gemmill; Anna Cathy Williams; Liz Cooke; Marcia Grant
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.257

3.  Social support following perinatal loss.

Authors:  Karen Kavanaugh; Darcie Trier; Michelle Korzec
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.818

4.  Recurrent perinatal loss: a case study.

Authors:  K Kavanaugh; P A Robertson
Journal:  Omega (Westport)       Date:  1999

5.  The decision-making process of young adult women with cancer who considered fertility cryopreservation.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Lorna Finnegan; Penny F Pierce; Bert Scoccia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-11-20

6.  Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Teresa A Savage; Robert E Kimura; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Miriam Kuppermann; William Grobman; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-05

7.  Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period.

Authors:  Teresa T Moro; Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa A Savage; Maria R Reyes; Robert E Kimura; Rama Bhat
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

Review 8.  Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Death and bereavement in a paediatric intensive care unit: Parental perceptions of staff support.

Authors:  Andrew J Macnab; Tracie Northway; Karen Ryall; Deborah Scott; Geoffrey Straw
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Stressors, resources, and stress responses in pregnant African American women: a mixed-methods pilot study.

Authors:  Carmen Giurgescu; Karen Kavanaugh; Kathleen F Norr; Barbara L Dancy; Naomi Twigg; Barbara L McFarlin; Christopher G Engeland; Mary Dawn Hennessy; Rosemary C White-Traut
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.