Literature DB >> 9469310

Treatment of infection associated with segmental bone loss in the proximal part of the femur in two stages with use of an antibiotic-loaded interval prosthesis.

A S Younger1, C P Duncan, B A Masri.   

Abstract

Treatment of an infection at the site of a total hip replacement associated with extensive loss of the proximal part of the femur is a challenging problem. In the present preliminary report, we describe the results after use of a prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC) in thirty such hips. The purpose of the prosthesis, which acts as an internal splint, is to maintain the length of the femur as well as the range of motion of the joint and the mobility of the patient between stages. A local level of antibiotics is maintained by the antibiotic-coated surface. A PROSTALAC with a cement-on-cement articulation was used in the first fifteen hips (Group I) in the study, and a custom metal-on-polyethylene articulating PROSTALAC was inserted in the subsequent fifteen hips (Group II). One patient who had a recurrent infection was managed with a second two-stage exchange and was included in both groups. Between stages, the average limb-length discrepancy was twenty-five millimeters despite a loss of more than 25 per cent of the femur in nineteen limbs. Sixteen patients were discharged home and seven, to a community hospital between stages. Six patients in Group I and only one in Group II were hospitalized for the entire course of treatment. The total duration of hospitalization for both stages averaged thirty-eight days. Twenty-eight patients were mobile even though they did not bear weight on the involved limb between stages: three patients used a cane, fifteen used crutches, and ten used a walker. Twenty-six patients reported no, slight, or moderate pain in the thigh, groin, or buttock between stages. The average Harris hip score before the first stage of the operation was 23 points (range, 0 to 63 points), which improved to 74 points (range, 40 to 91 points) at an average of forty-seven months (range, twenty-four to 114 months) postoperatively. Two patients died of unrelated causes before two years (the minimum follow-up period) had elapsed and were excluded from the final analysis; they had no evidence of recurrent infection. Of the remaining twenty-eight hips, twenty-seven (96 per cent) had no evidence of infection at the most recent follow-up examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9469310     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199801000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  24 in total

1.  Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 2: Health-related quality of life and function with the PROSTALAC implant in situ.

Authors:  Angela Scharfenberger; Marcia Clark; Guy Lavoie; Greg O'Connor; Edward Masson; Lauren A Beaupre
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Should well-fixed uncemented femoral components be revised in infected hip arthroplasty? Report of five trial cases.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Syusuke Ueda; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-01

4.  The effect of endoskeleton on antibiotic impregnated cement spacer for treating deep hip infection.

Authors:  Kuo-Ti Peng; Liang-Tseng Kuo; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Yao-Hung Tsai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Bioerodible system for sequential release of multiple drugs.

Authors:  Sharath C Sundararaj; Mark V Thomas; Thomas D Dziubla; David A Puleo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; C-H Flouzat-Lachianette; R Jalil; Sobrinho Uirassu Batista; I Guissou; A Poignard
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-03-02

8.  Treatment of an infected total hip replacement with the PROSTALAC system. Part 1: Infection resolution.

Authors:  Angela Scharfenberger; Marcia Clark; Guy Lavoie; Greg O'Connor; Edward Masson; Lauren A Beaupre
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 9.  Two-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections--spacer implantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Sukeik; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.