OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of biliary drainage catheter placement on bile duct wall thickness, we performed intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) in patients before and after biliary drainage. METHODS: Patients underwent IDUS before and after either short-term (n = 9, 6 to 8 days) or long-term (n = 9, 14 to 35 days) biliary drainage using a thin (2.0 mm diameter), 20 MHz probe inserted by means of a transpapillary route or a percutaneous tract. The bile duct wall thickness (mean +/- standard deviation) was retrospectively measured at the upper portion of the common hepatic duct. RESULTS: The bile duct wall thickness increased from 0.8+/-0.4 mm (predrainage) to 2.0+/-1.6 mm (post-drainage) in the long-term group (p < 0.001) but was not significantly increased in the short-term group. CONCLUSIONS: The bile duct wall thickness as measured on IDUS appears to be increased after placement of biliary drainage catheters.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of biliary drainage catheter placement on bile duct wall thickness, we performed intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) in patients before and after biliary drainage. METHODS:Patients underwent IDUS before and after either short-term (n = 9, 6 to 8 days) or long-term (n = 9, 14 to 35 days) biliary drainage using a thin (2.0 mm diameter), 20 MHz probe inserted by means of a transpapillary route or a percutaneous tract. The bile duct wall thickness (mean +/- standard deviation) was retrospectively measured at the upper portion of the common hepatic duct. RESULTS: The bile duct wall thickness increased from 0.8+/-0.4 mm (predrainage) to 2.0+/-1.6 mm (post-drainage) in the long-term group (p < 0.001) but was not significantly increased in the short-term group. CONCLUSIONS: The bile duct wall thickness as measured on IDUS appears to be increased after placement of biliary drainage catheters.
Authors: Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.647