Literature DB >> 9467309

In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers.

Y Momoi1, K Hirosaki, A Kohno, J F McCabe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to compare the rate of abrasive wear and change in surface roughness of resin-modified and conventional acid-base glass ionomers when subjected to toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion.
METHODS: Two resin-modified and two conventional glass ionomers were used. Samples of a high-copper amalgam and a hybrid resin composite were used as reference materials. Specimens of each material were prepared and subjected to toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion using 20,000 strokes of brushing. The amount of vertical loss of material was determined by profilometry (Surfcom-4A, Tokyo-Seimitsu, Tokyo, Japan). The surface characteristics after abrasion were evaluated on secondary electron images by SEM, and the surface hardness (KHN) was also measured for all materials. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05), followed by a multiple comparisons test using LSD (Least-significant difference) at a level of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: The abrasion resistance of resin-modified glass-ionomers was statistically lower for the amalgam and the resin composite reference materials. Statistically lower abrasion resistance and surface hardness were observed for the resin-modified glass ionomers than for their conventional acid-base counterparts when two forms of products from the same manufacturer were compared. SEM observations made after abrasion testing showed a significantly rougher surface for all glass ionomer materials than for the amalgam and the resin composite. SIGNIFICANCE: When comparisons were made between products from the same manufacturers, it was found that in vitro resistance to toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of the resin-modified glass ionomers is inferior to that of the conventional acid-base glass ionomers. The lower abrasion resistance found in the resin-modified products appears to be related to their lower surface hardness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9467309     DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80016-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  12 in total

1.  In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  R C Silva; A C C Zuanon; R R Esberard; M S M Candido; J S Machado
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  In Vitro Effect of Bleaching With 810 nm and 980 nm Diode Laser on Microhardness of Self-cure and Light-Cure Glass Ionomer Cements.

Authors:  Ladan Ranjbar Omrani; Sara Khoshamad; Elham Tabatabaei Ghomshe; Nasim Chiniforush; Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  The comparison of the effects of different whitening toothpastes on the micro hardness of a nano hybrid composite resin.

Authors:  Mohan Thomas Nainan; Ashok Kalappurakkal Balan; Roshni Sharma; Sabeena Susan Thomas; Santhosh B Deveerappa
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-11

4.  Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing.

Authors:  Heike M Korbmacher-Steiner; Arndt F Schilling; Lothar G Huck; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Michael Amling
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Dental casting alloys behaviour during power toothbrushing with toothpastes with various abrasivities. Part I: wear behavior.

Authors:  Ll Nogués; J Martinez-Gomis; C Molina; M Peraire; J Salsench; P Sevilla; F J Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Effect of Whitening Dentifrice on Micro Hardness, Colour Stability and Surface Roughness of Aesthetic Restorative Materials.

Authors:  K B Roopa; N Basappa; A R Prabhakar; O S Raju; Gagandeep Lamba
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Antimicrobial effects of dental luting glass ionomer cements on Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Sina Klai; Markus Altenburger; Bettina Spitzmüller; Annette Anderson; Elmar Hellwig; Ali Al-Ahmad
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-23

8.  Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field.

Authors:  Thomas Klinke; Amro Daboul; Anita Turek; Roland Frankenberger; Reinhard Hickel; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Effect of addition of Nano hydroxyapatite particles on wear of resin modified glass ionomer by tooth brushing simulation.

Authors:  Kiana Poorzandpoush; Ladan-Ranjbar Omrani; Shiva H Jafarnia; Parisa Golkar; Mohammad Atai
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 10.  Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Luciana Fávaro Francisconi; Polliana Mendes Candia Scaffa; Vivian Rosa dos Santos Paes de Barros; Margareth Coutinho; Paulo Afonso Silveira Francisconi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.