Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements.

Literature DB >> 17200824

In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements.

R C Silva¹, A C C Zuanon, R R Esberard, M S M Candido, J S Machado.

Abstract

This study evaluated the surface microhardness of four glass ionomer cements and a composite resin (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, Vidrion R, Vitromolar and Z 250). Ten specimens of each glass ionomer cement with 8.0 mm diameter and 5.0 mm high dimensions were made and Vicker's microhardness measurements were taken at 1 day and 1 week after initial setting reaction. The results were analyzed using Student's T test and Tukey test (p < 0.05) and demonstrated that the values of microhardness increased after 1 week, with the exception of Fuji IX. Resin composite Z250 presented the greatest values for microhardness.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year: 2007 PMID： 17200824 DOI： 10.1007/s10856-006-0672-y

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med ISSN： 0957-4530 Impact factor: 3.896

18 in total

1. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?

Authors: J E Frencken; C J Holmgren
Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 3.383

2. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.

Authors: Hak-Kong Yip; Roger J Smales; Chang Yu; Xu-Jun Gao; Dong-Mei Deng
Journal: Quintessence Int Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 1.677

3. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements.

Authors: J Ellakuria; R Triana; N Mínguez; I Soler; G Ibaseta; J Maza; F García-Godoy
Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.304

4. In situ microhardness evaluation of glass--ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials at different post-irradiation times.

Authors: R T Basting; M C Serra; A L Rodrigues
Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.837

Review 3. Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effects and Surface Micro hardness of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Bioactive Glass (S53P4):An in vitro Study.

Authors: A R Prabhakar; Jibi Paul M; N Basappa
Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Date: 2010-08-17

3 in total

In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements.

1. How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?

2. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.

3. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements.

4. In situ microhardness evaluation of glass--ionomer/composite resin hybrid materials at different post-irradiation times.

5. Predictions of restoration deterioration.

6. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.

7. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.

8. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers.

9. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes.

10. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers.

1. Effect of antibacterial agents on the surface hardness of a conventional glass-ionomer cement.

2. The effect of zeolite incorporation on the physical properties of silver-reinforced glass ionomer cement.

Review 3. Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effects and Surface Micro hardness of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Bioactive Glass (S53P4):An in vitro Study.